Synapzyzz
Tel Aviv, Israel, proud IDF Soldier!
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2025
- Posts
- 885
- Reputation
- 2,085
Why does bro keep tagging Eddie

Mirin the effortAs my guide about the PSL scale, sparked a lot of mixed opinions about ratings systems and the flaws and inconsistencies that each one have, i wanted to ask the general opinion of the forum of what the new consensus about "ratings" and "attractiveness" be, or if there should even be such a things as "ratings" to begin with, as a 2022cel i know there are probably several more experienced and well versed users here about this topic so i would like to ask for their opinion on the subject as I'm trying to improve my guide and actually provide valuable content for this forum and a new perspective into attractiveness that isn't the same bs that we all have heard from years on and on of "he is htn shes is stacy she is this and bla bla " .
rsMirin the effort
what would my thread need in order to be a botb candidate? to change/delete the graph used or rating method presented?There is no new consensus, but as far as I can tell ive spent the past 6 years on forum's & communities involving myself within aesthetics oriented spaces, Ive found it to be that almost every rater had one small difference in formula from another rater b/c of said raters specific bias's, there is no full proof accurate method of quantifying beauty on a numerical scale because of how little our dataset of averageness is. There is 2 much information to compile to gather a unanimous answer, however this does not refute the simple yet brutal fact that their is an objective when it comes to attractiveness and we can use this orthadontic pseudoscience to establish a general outline of what beauty is. In the modern context most raters use an out of 10 scale with the formula being;
A(P)=(0.45xH)+(0.2xD)+(0.2xBF)+(0.15xM)
Admin of .gg helping out with the communitys questions. What a great example


