Based Site's performance is a lot better (1 Viewer)

[Randomized]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

 

[FoidSlayer]

+7000$

 

[Synapzyzz]

ok?

 

[fent]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

dnr nigger!

 

[cp_2]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

bro can you unban me on org?

 

[Marlboro]

bro can you unban me on org?

why would you wanna be on that shit forum

 

[cp_2]

why would you wanna be on that shit forum

there are still some good users like @6ft4

 

[Randomized]

bro can you unban me on org?

You would have to make an appeal thread in the Ban Appeals category.

 

[cp_2]

You would have to make an appeal thread in the Appeals category.

dood i literally cant

 

[cp_2]

dood i literally cant

some cunt took my posting appeal option away

 

[Peace]

some cunt took my posting appeal option away

whatd u do jfl

 

[cp_2]

some cunt took my posting appeal option away

and also i am not alting and shit

 

[Randomized]

dood i literally cant

If they revoked your right to make posts then it means your situation is unappealable in general, and would require you to contact an Admin+ or the moderator who revoked your right to make posts.

 

[cp_2]

whatd u do jfl

nothing

literally jewish mods jfl

 

[Peace]

nothing

literally jewish mods jfl

arent they all

 

[Nardicus102]

nothing

literally jewish mods jfl

They get mad when you tag another mod to ra asses the situation

 

[cp_2]

If they revoked your right to make posts then it means your situation is unappealable in general, and would require you to contact an Admin+ or the moderator who revoked your right to make posts.

idk who banned me

i suspect its @numbthefag

 

[Randomized]

idk who banned me

i suspect its @numbthefag

Then it's over for you brother.

 

[cp_2]

Then it's over for you brother.

Then it's over for you brother.

 

[Randomized]

Thanks for the Reddit Gold Ted Bundy.

 

[Randomized]

You got raped by the top dog, the only way you could've been raped harder was if Master banned you.

 

[cp_2]

You got raped by the top dog, the only way you could've been raped harder was if Master banned you.

 

[cp_2]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

also fix server error

 

[cp_2]

also fix server error

Randomized do masters servers run on fucking potatos?

 

[Randomized]

I guess the live feature update doesn't live update deleted posts.