Based Site's performance is a lot better (1 Viewer)

[Randomized]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

 

[FoidSlayer]

+7000$

 

[Dahker]

ok?

 

[fent]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

dnr nigger!

 

[cp_2]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

bro can you unban me on org?

 

[Marlboro]

bro can you unban me on org?

why would you wanna be on that shit forum

 

[cp_2]

why would you wanna be on that shit forum

there are still some good users like @6ft4

 

[Randomized]

bro can you unban me on org?

You would have to make an appeal thread in the Ban Appeals category.

 

[cp_2]

You would have to make an appeal thread in the Appeals category.

dood i literally cant

 

[cp_2]

dood i literally cant

some cunt took my posting appeal option away

 

[Peace]

some cunt took my posting appeal option away

whatd u do jfl

 

[cp_2]

some cunt took my posting appeal option away

and also i am not alting and shit

 

[Randomized]

dood i literally cant

If they revoked your right to make posts then it means your situation is unappealable in general, and would require you to contact an Admin+ or the moderator who revoked your right to make posts.

 

[cp_2]

whatd u do jfl

nothing

literally jewish mods jfl

 

[Peace]

nothing

literally jewish mods jfl

arent they all

 

[Nardicus]

nothing

literally jewish mods jfl

They get mad when you tag another mod to ra asses the situation

 

[cp_2]

If they revoked your right to make posts then it means your situation is unappealable in general, and would require you to contact an Admin+ or the moderator who revoked your right to make posts.

idk who banned me

i suspect its @numbthefag

 

[Randomized]

idk who banned me

i suspect its @numbthefag

Then it's over for you brother.

 

[cp_2]

Then it's over for you brother.

Then it's over for you brother.

 

[Randomized]

Thanks for the Reddit Gold @Ted Bundy.

 

[Randomized]

You got raped by the top dog, the only way you could've been raped harder was if Master banned you.

 

[cp_2]

You got raped by the top dog, the only way you could've been raped harder was if Master banned you.

 

[cp_2]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

also fix server error

 

[cp_2]

also fix server error

@Randomized do masters servers run on fucking potatos?

 

[Randomized]

I guess the live feature update doesn't live update deleted posts.

 

[Nardicus]

You got raped by the top dog, the only way you could've been raped harder was if Master banned you.

it seems all good user's get banned, but they don't enforce children hard enough at the same time.
Cause they know there the one who are most likely to pay extra on the site

 

[Randomized]

@Randomized do masters servers run on fucking potatos?

I'm not sure I understand what the situation with his server hosting is. I'm only Sub Admin, so I wouldn't have access to anything in the back-end.

 

[cp_2]

I'm not sure I understand what the situation with his server hosting is. I'm only Sub Admin, so I wouldn't have access to anything in the back-end.

sorry i mean search bar is not working

 

[cp_2]

sorry i mean search bar is not working

@Randomized why jfl react?

 

[Randomized]

@Randomized why jfl react?

Sub Admins are just head content moderators, I don't have any access to the back-end including the ACP. I can't make any changes to the site.

 

[cp_2]

Sub Admins are just head content moderators, I don't have any access to the back-end including the ACP. I can't make any changes to the site.

tell numbthepain to get working otherwise master wont pay him

 

[HailSanta]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

Dont forget to zip up the pants after your done

 

[Z1gler7]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

everytime i load into the site and press notis it still always says error or some shit and i need to reload the site again

 

[Randomized]

everytime i load into the site and press notis it still always says error or some shit and i need to reload the site again

I haven't actually had any issues with the notification system yet but I'm sure an aspect of it is I don't get a lot of notifications on here.

On XenForo sometimes notifications cause issues when threads are deleted/altered but haven't updated on the user-end yet, but it would mainly be for individual notifications and not the whole system.

Sometimes clearing out your cookies for the site will fix it (depends on what's causing the issue).

 

[Scarface]

When I was first lurking .gg, the performance (loading time) was really bad, and even disabling a lot of the features I could in settings it would still load pretty bad. It runs a lot smoother now and a lot of the UI changes looks nice. I was afraid some of the features were going to cause it to load worse, but it seems good now. The live updates to threads and so on is also cool that didn't really effect my performance when viewing threads, but I also didn't have like 50 users responding to a single thread at the same time, so I'm not sure how it'd be with larger amounts of requests being made at once.

One of the bigger "problems" I had when first browsing the site was how similar it was to .org at the time as well. I didn't really have a desire to use a clone, I'm interested in looksmaxxing but not the concept of joining every .org clone I could, if that makes sense. I see you guys stepped away from it a lot and started doing your own thing, which is cool.

I also think the policy change on the quality requirements for new threads is also nice. It's something I wish other sites would implement, but I also understand how much content is produced on on other sites this would cause an increase in labor that's probably not worth it, espically counting these kinds of sites use a volunteer based system for moderator positions. You guys are in the earlier stages of activity and development where you have more control of the kind of culture you want the site to have.

Dnr