- Joined
- Nov 4, 2025
- Posts
- 1,616
- Reputation
- 1,923
I see tons of bullshit about ethnics saying that their misc is better and that white men are low dimo
I think that blonde hair is perceived as low dimophism is because its frequently Seen alongside children. For example my primary school class, About 30% of the people were blonde haired
Now its maybe 10%. Additionally, In these comparisons They always show a more medium-skinned ethnic e.g a north african and then show some Sickly pale nord with borderline albino hair and shaved eyebrows. And then they'll claim any white person who is tanned and black haired.
Meanwhile Ethnics tend to be t50s with low contrast, Although just a dark kind of low contrast.
I think that blonde hair is perceived as low dimophism is because its frequently Seen alongside children. For example my primary school class, About 30% of the people were blonde haired
Now its maybe 10%. Additionally, In these comparisons They always show a more medium-skinned ethnic e.g a north african and then show some Sickly pale nord with borderline albino hair and shaved eyebrows. And then they'll claim any white person who is tanned and black haired.
Meanwhile Ethnics tend to be t50s with low contrast, Although just a dark kind of low contrast.

