Rage Who is the retarded faggot who marked my thread "Misinformation" (21 Viewers)

[Dexter]

Same happened to me the mods are just a bunch of retards

which post, fag? link the thread/post, atleast.

I'll see if it truly was misinformation.

 

[MedSlayer]

which post, fag? link the thread/post, atleast.

I'll see if it truly was misinformation.

It got deleted
Being a fag and a retard must be hard

 

[Dexter]

It got deleted
Being a fag and a retard must be hard

then tell me what it was about, retard. unless you're an amnesiac.

 

[MedSlayer]

then tell me what it was about, retard. unless you're an amnesiac.

Was abt how we overrate a lot the importance of side profile with abt 5 different arguments all with atleast 3 studies backing me up

 

[Tismo]

damn thats fucked up

 

[Peace]

then tell me what it was about, retard. unless you're an amnesiac.

nice avi bhai, how u liking s4

 

[HailSanta]

then tell me what it was about, retard. unless you're an amnesiac.

Watch your mouth boy us peasants have more power than you’ll ever know when we unite

 

[Dexter]

nice avi bhai, how u liking s4

watched like 2 eps

i only read the comics as a kid, loved it

 

[Tismo]

watched like 2 eps

i only read the comics as a kid, loved it

nigga answered the wrong thing

 

[Dexter]

Was abt how we overrate a lot the importance of side profile with abt 5 different arguments all with atleast 3 studies backing me up

study: For the 240 white women studied (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.2] years), attractiveness scores ranged from 3.4 to 9.5 for frontal images and 3.3 to 9.4 for lateral images. The mean (SD) frontal attractiveness score was 6.9 (1.4), whereas the mean (SD) lateral attractiveness score was 6.4 (1.3). Simple linear regression of frontal and lateral attractiveness scores resulted in a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.749. Eight outlier pairs were identified and analyzed by panel evaluation. Panel evaluation revealed no clinically applicable association between frontal and lateral images among outliers; however, contributory facial features were suggested. Thin upper lip, convex nose, and blunt cervicomental angle were suggested by evaluators as facial characteristics that contributed to outlier frontal or lateral attractiveness scores.

 

[Peace]

watched like 2 eps

i only read the comics as a kid, loved it

yeah im quite enjoying marks attitude towards villains atm

 

[Tismo]

study: For the 240 white women studied (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.2] years), attractiveness scores ranged from 3.4 to 9.5 for frontal images and 3.3 to 9.4 for lateral images. The mean (SD) frontal attractiveness score was 6.9 (1.4), whereas the mean (SD) lateral attractiveness score was 6.4 (1.3). Simple linear regression of frontal and lateral attractiveness scores resulted in a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.749. Eight outlier pairs were identified and analyzed by panel evaluation. Panel evaluation revealed no clinically applicable association between frontal and lateral images among outliers; however, contributory facial features were suggested. Thin upper lip, convex nose, and blunt cervicomental angle were suggested by evaluators as facial characteristics that contributed to outlier frontal or lateral attractiveness scores.

but did you delete his thread ?

 

[Dexter]

but did you delete his thread ?

don't even remember him ever posting something like that

 

[MedSlayer]

study: For the 240 white women studied (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.2] years), attractiveness scores ranged from 3.4 to 9.5 for frontal images and 3.3 to 9.4 for lateral images. The mean (SD) frontal attractiveness score was 6.9 (1.4), whereas the mean (SD) lateral attractiveness score was 6.4 (1.3). Simple linear regression of frontal and lateral attractiveness scores resulted in a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.749. Eight outlier pairs were identified and analyzed by panel evaluation. Panel evaluation revealed no clinically applicable association between frontal and lateral images among outliers; however, contributory facial features were suggested. Thin upper lip, convex nose, and blunt cervicomental angle were suggested by evaluators as facial characteristics that contributed to outlier frontal or lateral attractiveness scores.

Thats why u needed the thread

 

[Tismo]

so who deleted the thread im lost now

 

[MedSlayer]

don't even remember him ever posting something like that

Yeah cuz i posted it at 3 am and got deleted in 30 sec

 

[MedSlayer]

so who deleted the thread im lost now

Prolly godveil and his goons

 

[Dexter]

Yeah cuz i posted it at 3 am and got deleted in 30 sec

idk where you live, so idk what time that must've been for me

 

[Tismo]

Prolly godveil and his goons

well if he is out what more can you do

 

[MedSlayer]

idk where you live, so idk what time that must've been for me

In North America, I don’t live in the slums but anyway, to respond to your study recognizing aesthetic qualities in something doesn’t necessarily mean it will increase attraction. It was one my argument it’s why I said the side profile doesn’t matter that much.

 

[Tabula Rasa]

which post, fag? link the thread/post, atleast.

I'll see if it truly was misinformation.

https://looksmax.gg/threads/mechano...ng-full-science-breakdown-and-theories.25319/

This is still marked as misinformation

 

[Circadex]

users have full rights to say whatever they want as long as it doesn't break rules, u can argue against without using moderation powers

So cucked

Stop letting people do whatever they want. Misinformation is cancerous to forum narrative

Circafag

Mind broken cretin shush

 

[Tabula Rasa]

So cucked

Stop letting people do whatever they want. Misinformation is cancerous to forum narrative


Mind broken cretin shush

Circatard

 

[Dexter]

https://looksmax.gg/threads/mechano...ng-full-science-breakdown-and-theories.25319/

This is still marked as misinformation

I didn't mark this one

 

[Tabula Rasa]

I didn't mark this one

You can't remove that?