[Circadex]

Ai-generated threads should result in an instant ban; this forum consistently faces people who post AI-generated threads, most of which go undetected.

I propose an instant and permanent ban if a user is caught using AI to generate threads.

AI is detrimental to a forums quality in many ways, most of which is obvious to people with more than 10 IQ. But incase you're far-left of the bell curve: Ai promotes a low-effort environment, It spreads misinformation, and it fails to go in-depth on the topics it discusses (Though this is usually because the snot-eating monkeys fail to put any effort into their prompt; they're retarded).

Though it is nuanced from case-to-case instances, if the user is only guilty of using AI to slightly edit/refine a thread, the punishment should be less severe.

And obviously, sufficient evidence is needed to result in action.

I also think Admincel should introduce an auto-AI filter (e.g., GPTZero) to notify moderators to review the thread and pick an appropriate action.

The aforementioned precautions would promote a much more high-effort environment.

Spoiler: Moderation tags

Godveil Heir Machiavellian

Spoiler: Church of PREET

Circadex BastiHgH 1ncel chadpreet @Determinism Kurdish_slayer sjzso 6zrir6a certified_LTN ilikemylittlesister highinhibmanlet GENESIS D Dizzle kanyewestlover66 FaZe_Kjetil00 VelocityAnt¹ ethnic sapphire justnemat nonexistent. Daniel zacks Daquavius the third

 

[Judenbänker]

Bro excluded me from cp

agreed tho

 

[hide]

There can be useful tho

 

[hide]

What does it matter if a human or Ai bot made it
If i can use the information i will

 

[VelocityAnt¹]

How many "high iq" niggas been imposters

 

[hide]

This forum will ultimately become a social credit system

 

[Circadex]

Bro excluded me from cp

agreed tho

Copied it from preet dictionary lol. I'll add you in next time

 

[Circadex]

What does it matter if a human or Ai bot made it
If i can use the information i will

Did you even read what i said

 

[hide]

Did you even read what i said

Yeah, but you’re talking about some low-IQ monkey. They now get banned anyway.

If AI detectors become a thing, you won’t even be able to use AI to express your thoughts better or write things down properly,
and much faster than before.

Especially now that this forum is growing.

 

[Circadex]

Yeah, but you’re talking about some low-IQ monkey. They now get banned anyway.

They wouldn't

If AI detectors become a thing, you won’t even be able to use AI to express your thoughts better or write things down properly,

Zero corelation to using AI for making threads

 

[hide]

They wouldn't


Zero corelation to using AI for making threads

"I propose an instant and permanent ban if a user is caught using AI to generate threads "

U retard

 

[Circadex]

"I propose an instant and permanent ban if a user is caught using AI to generate threads "

U retard

I thought you were referencing the stricter moderation imposed by veil.

Well my second point still stands

 

[hide]

I thought you were referencing the stricter moderation imposed by veil.

Well my second point still stands

My bad I didn't fully read the last part
I agree

 

[Circadex]

My bad I didn't fully read the last part
I agree

What did you miss

 

[Endo]

Ai-generated threads should result in an instant ban; this forum consistently faces people who post AI-generated threads, most of which go undetected.

I propose an instant and permanent ban if a user is caught using AI to generate threads.

AI is detrimental to a forums quality in many ways, most of which is obvious to people with more than 10 IQ. But incase you're far-left of the bell curve: Ai promotes a low-effort environment, It spreads misinformation, and it fails to go in-depth on the topics it discusses (Though this is usually because the snot-eating monkeys fail to put any effort into their prompt; they're retarded).

Though it is nuanced from case-to-case instances, if the user is only guilty of using AI to slightly edit/refine a thread, the punishment should be less severe.

And obviously, sufficient evidence is needed to result in action.

I also think Admincel should introduce an auto-AI filter (e.g., GPTZero) to notify moderators to review the thread and pick an appropriate action.

The aforementioned precautions would promote a much more high-effort environment.

Spoiler: Moderation tags

Godveil Heir Machiavellian

Spoiler: Church of PREET

Circadex BastiHgH 1ncel chadpreet @Determinism Kurdish_slayer sjzso 6zrir6a certified_LTN ilikemylittlesister highinhibmanlet GENESIS D Dizzle kanyewestlover66 FaZe_Kjetil00 VelocityAnt¹ ethnic sapphire justnemat nonexistent. Daniel zacks Daquavius the third

Realistically probably a rep reset or reduction

 

[Circadex]

Realistically probably a rep reset or reduction

So they can just post more GBT-slop?

 

[adolfbrax]

Ai-generated threads should result in an instant ban; this forum consistently faces people who post AI-generated threads, most of which go undetected.

I propose an instant and permanent ban if a user is caught using AI to generate threads.

AI is detrimental to a forums quality in many ways, most of which is obvious to people with more than 10 IQ. But incase you're far-left of the bell curve: Ai promotes a low-effort environment, It spreads misinformation, and it fails to go in-depth on the topics it discusses (Though this is usually because the snot-eating monkeys fail to put any effort into their prompt; they're retarded).

Though it is nuanced from case-to-case instances, if the user is only guilty of using AI to slightly edit/refine a thread, the punishment should be less severe.

And obviously, sufficient evidence is needed to result in action.

I also think Admincel should introduce an auto-AI filter (e.g., GPTZero) to notify moderators to review the thread and pick an appropriate action.

The aforementioned precautions would promote a much more high-effort environment.

Spoiler: Moderation tags

Godveil Heir Machiavellian

Spoiler: Church of PREET

Circadex BastiHgH 1ncel chadpreet @Determinism Kurdish_slayer sjzso 6zrir6a certified_LTN ilikemylittlesister highinhibmanlet GENESIS D Dizzle kanyewestlover66 FaZe_Kjetil00 VelocityAnt¹ ethnic sapphire justnemat nonexistent. Daniel zacks Daquavius the third

w ngl

 

[bonebaby]

Bro excluded me from cp

agreed tho

Do NOT abbreviate church of preet bhai

 

[Endo]

So they can just post more GBT-slop?

But nobody will listen to a guy with 1k posts and 3 rep

 

[adolfbrax]

Do NOT abbreviate church of preet bhai

CAGEEEEEEEE

 

[Circadex]

But nobody will listen to a guy with 1k posts and 3 rep

That doesn't matter. It still clogs up the forum with water GBT-slop.

 

[Godveil Heir]

I already delete retarded AI slop with warnings

@ Admincel should introduce an auto-AI filter (e.g., GPTZero) to notify moderators to review the thread and pick an appropriate action.

Automating it would be stupid because it will also alert for the formatting with AI, not pure AI slop.

 

[nonexistent.]

Depends, maybe if their "high iq mind" was writing down a lot and then AI summarized it. But otherwise from that, threads should be your own research and not some program.

 

[Circadex]

Automating it would be stupid because it will also alert for the formatting with AI, not pure AI slop.

threshold it at 70%<

I already delete retarded AI slop with warnings

you can't see them all

 

[Godveil Heir]

threshold it at 70%<

Varies dramatically depending on which AI you choose to create a thread and which you use to detect it.
Also there's barely any difference with using to format notes or just generating thread from 0

you can't see them all

And you expect me to scroll through the alerts solely to find AI posts?
They are a rare occurrence, forum isn't filled with them
who gives a fuck about adding another feature for that?
It costs too much extra money to buy AI for detection and too much effort to ensure it works properly without bugs.