Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

The improved version of a canthoplasty/pexy (2 Viewers)

The improved version of a canthoplasty/pexy

surgerymax

Iron
Joined
Dec 30, 2025
Posts
378
Reputation
957
  • #1

Normal canthoplasty

The lateral canthal tendon is actually detached. A lateral canthotomy is made at the outer corner, inferior cantholysis releases the lower crus, and now you have complete mobility of the lower lid. The canthus can be repositioned and then reconstructed at a new location with real tension , thus you can not only raise the lateral canthus but the tension from this will lift tighten the lower eyelid.

The gold standard within canthoplasty is the tarsal strip technique.
1777844223594.png

The problems that come with it

Every fixation technique faces the same engineering challenge being that you need to hold the canthus against forces that are constantly trying to pull it back down. The question is what you're anchoring your suture to.

In standard canthopexy and most canthoplasty techniques, you're anchoring to periosteum
This has structural limitations that become apparent over months and years meaning a degree relapse of the canthoplasty is very common.


Bone Drill Fixation (Bone drill cantho)​



Standard canthopexy and canthoplasty both ultimately rely on sutures anchored to periosteum. Periosteum is soft tissue. It can stretch, it can be cut through by suture tension over time thus relapse can happen , with bone drill fixation you are attaching the lateral canthus structures the bone via the wire passing through the drill holes , meaning a much more powerful anchor.

The bone drill fixation bypasses these issues , not only that but you can get a more aggressive change with the actual procedure so not only much lower chances of relapse but also a better actual result. (Not healed yet ofc)

1777844720024.png

1777844739189.png


In this paper the authors describe what would be considered a reliable and standard technique for lateral canthoplasty, a double hole lateral orbital rim canthal repositioning technique done through an upper eyelid incision , there did not seem to be any significantly complications and though alot of hypercorrection may be needed to make the permanent result as the patient desired , all patients were satisfied with their results

https://www.researchgate.net/public...c_Canthopexy_Drill_Hole_Canthal_Repositioning

1777844538683.png



1777844797313.png



1777844822190.png




Of course it is based on client request , you don't have to go anywhere near as upturned as some of these retarded patients chose to do so.​



Combination of Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair (LERR)

LERR in itself helps massively to prevent relapse in canthoplasty as it removes opposing forces that are acting against the fixation
The lower lid retractors , the capsulopalpebral fascia and its associated smooth muscle fibers originate from the inferior rectus muscle, wrap around the inferior oblique, and insert onto the inferior edge of the tarsal plate.
Their job is to pull the lower lid down when you look down
When these retractors become tight, scarred, or contracted, they exert constant downward tension on the lid margin even at rest.


1777845696597.png

This probably sounds like a bunch of jargon basically what you need to understand is that the lower eyelid will create forces acting against the canthoplasty and is a big contributor to relapse

A LERR will remove this force as the retractors are surgically released their insertion on the tarsal plate therefore eliminating the tension on the lid.
After LERR the lid is no longer being actively pulled downward



Even with bone drill fixation you can place the most stable lateral anchor possible, but if the retractors are still tight and pulling the lid downward across its full length, you've only fixed the lateral corner. The central portion of the lid will still sit too low because the bone drill anchors the outer corner

What this will result in is the canthus itself sitting at an ideal height the lateral angle is sharp and defined but the central lid margin is still showing sclera.


When combined

LERR removes the pulling force
Bone drill canthopexy provides the stable lateral anchor

So you can get a result that not only looks better but is MUCH less likely to relapse

Periosteal canthopexy (regular cantho) plus LERR sometimes still relapses because even with the retractors released, the soft tissue anchor of the canthopexy stretches over time. The lid then drifts despite the LERR working as intended. Bone drill canthopexy removes this weak link entirely


Important to note though I am extrapolating alot of information of mechanistic reasoning when entering the realm of bone drill canthoplasty as it is quite new , the ideas presented i believe would be broadly quite accepted amongst surgeons and do all make sense logically.​


Thanks for reading.
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Posts
428
Reputation
1,522
  • #2

Normal canthoplasty

The lateral canthal tendon is actually detached. A lateral canthotomy is made at the outer corner, inferior cantholysis releases the lower crus, and now you have complete mobility of the lower lid. The canthus can be repositioned and then reconstructed at a new location with real tension , thus you can not only raise the lateral canthus but the tension from this will lift tighten the lower eyelid.

The gold standard within canthoplasty is the tarsal strip technique.
View attachment 46357

The problems that come with it

Every fixation technique faces the same engineering challenge being that you need to hold the canthus against forces that are constantly trying to pull it back down. The question is what you're anchoring your suture to.

In standard canthopexy and most canthoplasty techniques, you're anchoring to periosteum
This has structural limitations that become apparent over months and years meaning a degree relapse of the canthoplasty is very common.


Bone Drill Fixation (Bone drill cantho)​



Standard canthopexy and canthoplasty both ultimately rely on sutures anchored to periosteum. Periosteum is soft tissue. It can stretch, it can be cut through by suture tension over time thus relapse can happen , with bone drill fixation you are attaching the lateral canthus structures the bone via the wire passing through the drill holes , meaning a much more powerful anchor.

The bone drill fixation bypasses these issues , not only that but you can get a more aggressive change with the actual procedure so not only much lower chances of relapse but also a better actual result. (Not healed yet ofc)

View attachment 46360
View attachment 46361

In this paper the authors describe what would be considered a reliable and standard technique for lateral canthoplasty, a double hole lateral orbital rim canthal repositioning technique done through an upper eyelid incision , there did not seem to be any significantly complications and though alot of hypercorrection may be needed to make the permanent result as the patient desired , all patients were satisfied with their results

https://www.researchgate.net/public...c_Canthopexy_Drill_Hole_Canthal_Repositioning

View attachment 46358


View attachment 46362


View attachment 46363



Of course it is based on client request , you don't have to go anywhere near as upturned as some of these retarded patients chose to do so.​



Combination of Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair (LERR)

LERR in itself helps massively to prevent relapse in canthoplasty as it removes opposing forces that are acting against the fixation
The lower lid retractors , the capsulopalpebral fascia and its associated smooth muscle fibers originate from the inferior rectus muscle, wrap around the inferior oblique, and insert onto the inferior edge of the tarsal plate.
Their job is to pull the lower lid down when you look down
When these retractors become tight, scarred, or contracted, they exert constant downward tension on the lid margin even at rest.


View attachment 46364
This probably sounds like a bunch of jargon basically what you need to understand is that the lower eyelid will create forces acting against the canthoplasty and is a big contributor to relapse

A LERR will remove this force as the retractors are surgically released their insertion on the tarsal plate therefore eliminating the tension on the lid.
After LERR the lid is no longer being actively pulled downward



Even with bone drill fixation you can place the most stable lateral anchor possible, but if the retractors are still tight and pulling the lid downward across its full length, you've only fixed the lateral corner. The central portion of the lid will still sit too low because the bone drill anchors the outer corner

What this will result in is the canthus itself sitting at an ideal height the lateral angle is sharp and defined but the central lid margin is still showing sclera.


When combined

LERR removes the pulling force
Bone drill canthopexy provides the stable lateral anchor

So you can get a result that not only looks better but is MUCH less likely to relapse

Periosteal canthopexy (regular cantho) plus LERR sometimes still relapses because even with the retractors released, the soft tissue anchor of the canthopexy stretches over time. The lid then drifts despite the LERR working as intended. Bone drill canthopexy removes this weak link entirely


Important to note though I am extrapolating alot of information of mechanistic reasoning when entering the realm of bone drill canthoplasty as it is quite new , the ideas presented i believe would be broadly quite accepted amongst surgeons and do all make sense logically.​


Thanks for reading.
Appreciate the extrapolation
 

makeaway

Iron
Joined
Mar 3, 2026
Posts
425
Reputation
643
  • #3

Normal canthoplasty

The lateral canthal tendon is actually detached. A lateral canthotomy is made at the outer corner, inferior cantholysis releases the lower crus, and now you have complete mobility of the lower lid. The canthus can be repositioned and then reconstructed at a new location with real tension , thus you can not only raise the lateral canthus but the tension from this will lift tighten the lower eyelid.

The gold standard within canthoplasty is the tarsal strip technique.
View attachment 46357

The problems that come with it

Every fixation technique faces the same engineering challenge being that you need to hold the canthus against forces that are constantly trying to pull it back down. The question is what you're anchoring your suture to.

In standard canthopexy and most canthoplasty techniques, you're anchoring to periosteum
This has structural limitations that become apparent over months and years meaning a degree relapse of the canthoplasty is very common.


Bone Drill Fixation (Bone drill cantho)​



Standard canthopexy and canthoplasty both ultimately rely on sutures anchored to periosteum. Periosteum is soft tissue. It can stretch, it can be cut through by suture tension over time thus relapse can happen , with bone drill fixation you are attaching the lateral canthus structures the bone via the wire passing through the drill holes , meaning a much more powerful anchor.

The bone drill fixation bypasses these issues , not only that but you can get a more aggressive change with the actual procedure so not only much lower chances of relapse but also a better actual result. (Not healed yet ofc)

View attachment 46360
View attachment 46361

In this paper the authors describe what would be considered a reliable and standard technique for lateral canthoplasty, a double hole lateral orbital rim canthal repositioning technique done through an upper eyelid incision , there did not seem to be any significantly complications and though alot of hypercorrection may be needed to make the permanent result as the patient desired , all patients were satisfied with their results

https://www.researchgate.net/public...c_Canthopexy_Drill_Hole_Canthal_Repositioning

View attachment 46358


View attachment 46362


View attachment 46363



Of course it is based on client request , you don't have to go anywhere near as upturned as some of these retarded patients chose to do so.​



Combination of Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair (LERR)

LERR in itself helps massively to prevent relapse in canthoplasty as it removes opposing forces that are acting against the fixation
The lower lid retractors , the capsulopalpebral fascia and its associated smooth muscle fibers originate from the inferior rectus muscle, wrap around the inferior oblique, and insert onto the inferior edge of the tarsal plate.
Their job is to pull the lower lid down when you look down
When these retractors become tight, scarred, or contracted, they exert constant downward tension on the lid margin even at rest.


View attachment 46364
This probably sounds like a bunch of jargon basically what you need to understand is that the lower eyelid will create forces acting against the canthoplasty and is a big contributor to relapse

A LERR will remove this force as the retractors are surgically released their insertion on the tarsal plate therefore eliminating the tension on the lid.
After LERR the lid is no longer being actively pulled downward



Even with bone drill fixation you can place the most stable lateral anchor possible, but if the retractors are still tight and pulling the lid downward across its full length, you've only fixed the lateral corner. The central portion of the lid will still sit too low because the bone drill anchors the outer corner

What this will result in is the canthus itself sitting at an ideal height the lateral angle is sharp and defined but the central lid margin is still showing sclera.


When combined

LERR removes the pulling force
Bone drill canthopexy provides the stable lateral anchor

So you can get a result that not only looks better but is MUCH less likely to relapse

Periosteal canthopexy (regular cantho) plus LERR sometimes still relapses because even with the retractors released, the soft tissue anchor of the canthopexy stretches over time. The lid then drifts despite the LERR working as intended. Bone drill canthopexy removes this weak link entirely


Important to note though I am extrapolating alot of information of mechanistic reasoning when entering the realm of bone drill canthoplasty as it is quite new , the ideas presented i believe would be broadly quite accepted amongst surgeons and do all make sense logically.​


Thanks for reading.
looks horrible compared
 

surgerymax

Iron
Joined
Dec 30, 2025
Posts
378
Reputation
957
  • #4

Includings

Iron
Joined
Apr 1, 2026
Posts
611
Reputation
935
  • #5

Normal canthoplasty

The lateral canthal tendon is actually detached. A lateral canthotomy is made at the outer corner, inferior cantholysis releases the lower crus, and now you have complete mobility of the lower lid. The canthus can be repositioned and then reconstructed at a new location with real tension , thus you can not only raise the lateral canthus but the tension from this will lift tighten the lower eyelid.

The gold standard within canthoplasty is the tarsal strip technique.
View attachment 46357

The problems that come with it

Every fixation technique faces the same engineering challenge being that you need to hold the canthus against forces that are constantly trying to pull it back down. The question is what you're anchoring your suture to.

In standard canthopexy and most canthoplasty techniques, you're anchoring to periosteum
This has structural limitations that become apparent over months and years meaning a degree relapse of the canthoplasty is very common.


Bone Drill Fixation (Bone drill cantho)​



Standard canthopexy and canthoplasty both ultimately rely on sutures anchored to periosteum. Periosteum is soft tissue. It can stretch, it can be cut through by suture tension over time thus relapse can happen , with bone drill fixation you are attaching the lateral canthus structures the bone via the wire passing through the drill holes , meaning a much more powerful anchor.

The bone drill fixation bypasses these issues , not only that but you can get a more aggressive change with the actual procedure so not only much lower chances of relapse but also a better actual result. (Not healed yet ofc)

View attachment 46360
View attachment 46361

In this paper the authors describe what would be considered a reliable and standard technique for lateral canthoplasty, a double hole lateral orbital rim canthal repositioning technique done through an upper eyelid incision , there did not seem to be any significantly complications and though alot of hypercorrection may be needed to make the permanent result as the patient desired , all patients were satisfied with their results

https://www.researchgate.net/public...c_Canthopexy_Drill_Hole_Canthal_Repositioning

View attachment 46358


View attachment 46362


View attachment 46363



Of course it is based on client request , you don't have to go anywhere near as upturned as some of these retarded patients chose to do so.​



Combination of Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair (LERR)

LERR in itself helps massively to prevent relapse in canthoplasty as it removes opposing forces that are acting against the fixation
The lower lid retractors , the capsulopalpebral fascia and its associated smooth muscle fibers originate from the inferior rectus muscle, wrap around the inferior oblique, and insert onto the inferior edge of the tarsal plate.
Their job is to pull the lower lid down when you look down
When these retractors become tight, scarred, or contracted, they exert constant downward tension on the lid margin even at rest.


View attachment 46364
This probably sounds like a bunch of jargon basically what you need to understand is that the lower eyelid will create forces acting against the canthoplasty and is a big contributor to relapse

A LERR will remove this force as the retractors are surgically released their insertion on the tarsal plate therefore eliminating the tension on the lid.
After LERR the lid is no longer being actively pulled downward



Even with bone drill fixation you can place the most stable lateral anchor possible, but if the retractors are still tight and pulling the lid downward across its full length, you've only fixed the lateral corner. The central portion of the lid will still sit too low because the bone drill anchors the outer corner

What this will result in is the canthus itself sitting at an ideal height the lateral angle is sharp and defined but the central lid margin is still showing sclera.


When combined

LERR removes the pulling force
Bone drill canthopexy provides the stable lateral anchor

So you can get a result that not only looks better but is MUCH less likely to relapse

Periosteal canthopexy (regular cantho) plus LERR sometimes still relapses because even with the retractors released, the soft tissue anchor of the canthopexy stretches over time. The lid then drifts despite the LERR working as intended. Bone drill canthopexy removes this weak link entirely


Important to note though I am extrapolating alot of information of mechanistic reasoning when entering the realm of bone drill canthoplasty as it is quite new , the ideas presented i believe would be broadly quite accepted amongst surgeons and do all make sense logically.​


Thanks for reading.
Looks effing painful, how much could one expect to be spending. Bookmarked nonetheless
 

surgerymax

Iron
Joined
Dec 30, 2025
Posts
378
Reputation
957
  • #6

Includings

Iron
Joined
Apr 1, 2026
Posts
611
Reputation
935
  • #7

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Similar threads
    Biomaxx ·

    Mogs New version of my stack

    15
    419
    shape1
    shape2
    shape3
    shape4
    shape5
    shape6
    Top