Discussion Suggestion: cooldown period before posting, after joining the forum (3 Viewers)

[dior]

I mog this whole thread fucking pussies

except for the mods

If ur below a 5.95-6.1 out of 10 I mog you.

 

[nettspend]

dont be mean

Yea idk I'm I'm lmtn I don't mog shit

 

[antifoidaction]

dior can you accept payment besides crypto for vip pls

 

[dior]

dior can you accept payment besides crypto for vip pls

What payment?

 

[FoidSlayer]

Yea idk I'm I'm lmtn I don't mog shit

its okay bhai you mog everyone in my heart

 

[Synapzyzz]

dior can you accept payment besides crypto for vip pls

they wanna evade taxes nigga why would they use joo bank transfer?

 

[nettspend]

its okay bhai you mog everyone in my heart

Thanks

 

[antifoidaction]

What payment?

cashapp

 

[dior]

cashapp

Talk to admincel, I dont want to connect my cashapp lmao

 

[irlesper]

I mog this whole thread fucking pussies

except for the mods

shut up nigger

 

[antifoidaction]

Talk to admincel, I dont want to connect my cashapp lmao

Admincel

 

[nettspend]

shut up nigger

ur low IQ cuck

 

[irlesper]

ur low IQ cuck

yea im a cukc

 

[Circadex]

Why not just prevent them from making guides/informative threads for a set amount of time? Limit tag usage until they're "ready". They may still post threads that are guides even without tags — so enforce on-topic discussion harsher. A 48 hour or week cooldown just encourages people to not bother coming back. The vast majority of users will just forget about this forum or discuss how it's cucked on other forums. No-ones going to read rules or educate themselves during the meantime, ideally they should, but no-one will. I can say if i got met with a 48 hour cooldown I'd of just never came back. I was "dipping my toes in the water" per se with a new community, and amongst other jewery, impatience is quite high-ranking.

What about quality reminders when they post their first few threads? Say, they make a thread & click post. They'll be met with a criteria that asks them "Does your thread meet XYZ? If not, revise/rethink the thread". Proper vetting should solve the need for this anyways though so it's made redundant.

 

[nettspend]

Why not just prevent them from making guides/informative threads for a set amount of time? Limit tag usage until they're "ready". They may still post threads that are guides even without tags — so enforce on-topic discussion harsher. A 48 hour or week cooldown just encourages people to not bother coming back. The vast majority of users will just forget about this forum or discuss how it's cucked on other forums. No-ones going to read rules or educate themselves during the meantime, ideally they should, but no-one will. I can say if i got met with a 48 hour cooldown I'd of just never came back. I was "dipping my toes in the water" per se with a new community, and amongst other jewery, impatience is quite high-ranking.

What about quality reminders when they post their first few threads? Say, they make a thread & click post. They'll be met with a criteria that asks them "Does your thread meet XYZ? If not, revise/rethink the thread". Proper vetting should solve the need for this anyways though so it's made redundant.

Bro uses big words to try and act smart

 

[Circadex]

Bro uses big words to try and act smart

Sorry i shouldn't speak past a grade 4 level in your presence as to not melt your mind

antifoidaction I'll find you

 

[Godveil Heir]

Why not just prevent them from making guides/informative threads for a set amount of time? Limit tag usage until they're "ready". They may still post threads that are guides even without tags

Retards argue in other people's threads with their retarded advice

 

[Circadex]

Retards argue in other people's threads with their retarded advice

Good point. Limit their privileges to respond to guides

 

[Godveil Heir]

Good point. Limit their privileges to respond to guides

it's not just guides, question evens
atp we're blocking everything but off-topic, which could be an idea
maybe unlocking only ratings, and 48 hour cooldown on looksmaxxing section

 

[antifoidaction]

Sorry i shouldn't speak past a grade 4 level in your presence as to not melt your mind

antifoidaction I'll find you

 

[Circadex]

it's not just guides, question evens
atp we're blocking everything but off-topic, which could be an idea
maybe unlocking only ratings, and 48 hour cooldown on looksmaxxing section

Not too good. People like lord, and lord of crime, and well no-one else. Forget that then JFL

But still, it's harsh. I think the priority should be to perfect vetting to a level where this bullshit isn't required

 

[irlesper]

Why not just prevent them from making guides/informative threads for a set amount of time? Limit tag usage until they're "ready". They may still post threads that are guides even without tags — so enforce on-topic discussion harsher. A 48 hour or week cooldown just encourages people to not bother coming back. The vast majority of users will just forget about this forum or discuss how it's cucked on other forums. No-ones going to read rules or educate themselves during the meantime, ideally they should, but no-one will. I can say if i got met with a 48 hour cooldown I'd of just never came back. I was "dipping my toes in the water" per se with a new community, and amongst other jewery, impatience is quite high-ranking.

What about quality reminders when they post their first few threads? Say, they make a thread & click post. They'll be met with a criteria that asks them "Does your thread meet XYZ? If not, revise/rethink the thread". Proper vetting should solve the need for this anyways though so it's made redundant.

blah blah blah just summarize your opinion and stop writing stuff just for shits & giggles