Discussion Sensitive nigger argument low effort summary (1 Viewer)

[Judenbänker]

Im gonna leave out the racebait at the beginning it was just trolling anyways look at sensitive sapphire's thread for that

First he asked me a question about my stance on (non-muslim) immigration

Spoiler: Stating my opinion

I was asked by him to give my opinion and so I did

In summary, (interracial/interethnic) immigration is always bad for a nation because it alters the ethnos, which is a nation's foundation.
Thats an opinion, there are other worldviews that for example argue a nation can also be based on a demos alone (civic nationalism) without concerns regarding ethnicity.

He instantly called me racist and again said he wasnt talking about muslims (cool ig who tf cares if theyre muslims?)

Spoiler: Claims without arguments

"Youre wrong about that"
*proceeds to not give any reason or argument why*
I say there is no wrong since opinions are subjective and cannot be ruled to be right or wrong objectively
"Some opinions are wrong" (logically impossible, hes too retarded to be able to differentiate between opinion and statement)
"Democracy is an(d) illusion"
Never even mentioned democracy, im probably the most antidemocratic guy here
He argues that because others cant control their race all the consequences of them being whatever race they are should be ignored
"No [to race realism,] we of all people should know that nobody had control over what they look like this is just racism"
Retarded take, race is not just about skin or even phenotype, lack of control doesnt prove or justify anything
Coping with racism as buzzword
Yes niggers are retarded and dont have the capability to live up to white society
He calls that racism but his sandnigger ass never experienced this en masse
This id not just based on myself as anecdote but also on what we know about intelligence and neurological differences

Spoiler: Opinions cannot be wrong

Me pointing out there was no mention of democracy and that opinions cannot be wrong
He thinks democracy is when opinions cant be wrong (simple logical conclusion)
As counterargument against "opinions cant be wrong" he brings up that a muslim can believe in the marriage of a 9yo with a muslim (reffering to aisha most likely), completely misses the point that factual truth/lack thereof and moral right/wrong are two seperate concepts
He even claims otherwise

What is factual?
Factual is something that can objectively be proven/is objectively true
Neither right nor wrong in the sense of truth xan apply to an opinion as those are just subjective statements of one's stance on a certain topic and dont involve claims that could be untrue. If so, the claim is seperate from the opinion

Considering the moral question
Its still not necessarily wrong since
a subjective morality has no authority beyond the subject itself, I cannot apply my morality onto others as its not superior to theirs in any way
b objective morality would first have to be consensually agreed upon for him to make an "isnt this morally wrong" argument
This doesnt matter anyways because he specifically claims its factually wrong ("how is it not factually wrong?")

So believing in the marriage of 9yo children, which i assume means supporting it rather than just believing in it's existence, is not inherently wrong. Its neither wrong factually, which is what the whole point was, nor morally as long as no objective morality (one given by a higher authority) has been agreed upon or atleast the moral-giver's supremacy has been acknowledged
He is also obviously not aware of the basic logical and philosophical concept of burden of proof, which is upon him (since as it's original latin name says(translated), "the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies". Clearly I am the one who denies the positive claim, which is that the mentioned opinion is wrong).
For no claim he made there was any argument or proof given, and what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The emotional cucking is insane though, muh you hurt my feelings
grow tf up nigger I was trolling at the start but in the end he actually pissed me off so much

Just to correct the retards in his thread's reply section
broodal 124iq mog

 

[Hexum]

ok

 

[bluesell]

Im gonna leave out the racebait at the beginning it was just trolling anyways look at sensitive sapphire's thread for that

First he asked me a question about my stance on (non-muslim) immigration

Spoiler: Stating my opinion

View attachment 49923
I was asked by him to give my opinion and so I did

In summary, (interracial/interethnic) immigration is always bad for a nation because it alters the ethnos, which is a nation's foundation.
Thats an opinion, there are other worldviews that for example argue a nation can also be based on a demos alone (civic nationalism) without concerns regarding ethnicity.

He instantly called me racist and again said he wasnt talking about muslims (cool ig who tf cares if theyre muslims?)

Spoiler: Claims without arguments

View attachment 49924
"Youre wrong about that"
*proceeds to not give any reason or argument why*
I say there is no wrong since opinions are subjective and cannot be ruled to be right or wrong objectively
"Some opinions are wrong" (logically impossible, hes too retarded to be able to differentiate between opinion and statement)
"Democracy is an(d) illusion"
Never even mentioned democracy, im probably the most antidemocratic guy here
He argues that because others cant control their race all the consequences of them being whatever race they are should be ignored
"No [to race realism,] we of all people should know that nobody had control over what they look like this is just racism"
Retarded take, race is not just about skin or even phenotype, lack of control doesnt prove or justify anything
Coping with racism as buzzword
Yes niggers are retarded and dont have the capability to live up to white society
He calls that racism but his sandnigger ass never experienced this en masse
This id not just based on myself as anecdote but also on what we know about intelligence and neurological differences

Spoiler: Opinions cannot be wrong

View attachment 49925
Me pointing out there was no mention of democracy and that opinions cannot be wrong
He thinks democracy is when opinions cant be wrong (simple logical conclusion)
As counterargument against "opinions cant be wrong" he brings up that a muslim can believe in the marriage of a 9yo with a muslim (reffering to aisha most likely), completely misses the point that factual truth/lack thereof and moral right/wrong are two seperate concepts
He even claims otherwise

What is factual?
Factual is something that can objectively be proven/is objectively true
Neither right nor wrong in the sense of truth xan apply to an opinion as those are just subjective statements of one's stance on a certain topic and dont involve claims that could be untrue. If so, the claim is seperate from the opinion

Considering the moral question
Its still not necessarily wrong since
a subjective morality has no authority beyond the subject itself, I cannot apply my morality onto others as its not superior to theirs in any way
b objective morality would first have to be consensually agreed upon for him to make an "isnt this morally wrong" argument
This doesnt matter anyways because he specifically claims its factually wrong ("how is it not factually wrong?")

So believing in the marriage of 9yo children, which i assume means supporting it rather than just believing in it's existence, is not inherently wrong. Its neither wrong factually, which is what the whole point was, nor morally as long as no objective morality (one given by a higher authority) has been agreed upon or atleast the moral-giver's supremacy has been acknowledged
He is also obviously not aware of the basic logical and philosophical concept of burden of proof, which is upon him (since as it's original latin name says(translated), "the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies". Clearly I am the one who denies the positive claim, which is that the mentioned opinion is wrong).
For no claim he made there was any argument or proof given, and what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The emotional cucking is insane though, muh you hurt my feelings
grow tf up nigger I was trolling at the start but in the end he actually pissed me off so much

Just to correct the retards in his thread's reply section
broodal 124iq mog

DNR

 

[sensitive sapphire]

im not reading all that nigga, believe what u want i'm not talking to u any further

 

[sensitive sapphire]

im not reading all that nigga, believe what u want i'm not talking to u any further

but still good luck i hope one day u can get past all this hatered u are feeling

 

[Judenbänker]

im not reading all that nigga, believe what u want i'm not talking to u any further

Just admit you couldnt argue against it


And then you cry about muh racism when I point out you sandniggers are retarded

 

[Hexum]

Just admit you couldnt argue against it


And then you cry about muh racism when I point out you sandniggers are retarded

We can all be friends

 

[Judenbänker]

We can all be friends

Obviously me not wanting brown people with 35iq points below my own flooding my nation makes him not wanting to be my friend anymore

 

[sensitive sapphire]

Just admit you couldnt argue against it


And then you cry about muh racism when I point out you sandniggers are retarded

no i just dont care enough to do, i cant change ur mind if u actully believe the shit u are saying its pointless

 

[Judenbänker]

no i just dont care enough to do, i cant change ur mind if u actully believe the shit u are saying its pointless

There's no limits to the COPE

 

[sensitive sapphire]

There's no limits to the COPE

sure bro sure whatever u say❤

 

[SinisterTRADition]

Me and the national socialist Bluds seeing this

 

[Judenbänker]

Me and the national socialist Bluds seeing this

Funniest post ive seen this week

 

[SinisterTRADition]

Funniest post ive seen this week

I’m number one ranked jester for a reason

 

[6ϛʇʇnqʎʇooqǝᴉʞoop]

dnr + L cope + SS (short for sensitive sapphire) iqmogs you

 

[SinisterTRADition]

dnr + L cope + SS (short for sensitive sapphire) iqmogs you

Waffle SS (Niche nat-soc reference) EBK

 

[Scorpion]

Im gonna leave out the racebait at the beginning it was just trolling anyways look at sensitive sapphire's thread for that

First he asked me a question about my stance on (non-muslim) immigration

Spoiler: Stating my opinion

View attachment 49923
I was asked by him to give my opinion and so I did

In summary, (interracial/interethnic) immigration is always bad for a nation because it alters the ethnos, which is a nation's foundation.
Thats an opinion, there are other worldviews that for example argue a nation can also be based on a demos alone (civic nationalism) without concerns regarding ethnicity.

He instantly called me racist and again said he wasnt talking about muslims (cool ig who tf cares if theyre muslims?)

Spoiler: Claims without arguments

View attachment 49924
"Youre wrong about that"
*proceeds to not give any reason or argument why*
I say there is no wrong since opinions are subjective and cannot be ruled to be right or wrong objectively
"Some opinions are wrong" (logically impossible, hes too retarded to be able to differentiate between opinion and statement)
"Democracy is an(d) illusion"
Never even mentioned democracy, im probably the most antidemocratic guy here
He argues that because others cant control their race all the consequences of them being whatever race they are should be ignored
"No [to race realism,] we of all people should know that nobody had control over what they look like this is just racism"
Retarded take, race is not just about skin or even phenotype, lack of control doesnt prove or justify anything
Coping with racism as buzzword
Yes niggers are retarded and dont have the capability to live up to white society
He calls that racism but his sandnigger ass never experienced this en masse
This id not just based on myself as anecdote but also on what we know about intelligence and neurological differences

Spoiler: Opinions cannot be wrong

View attachment 49925
Me pointing out there was no mention of democracy and that opinions cannot be wrong
He thinks democracy is when opinions cant be wrong (simple logical conclusion)
As counterargument against "opinions cant be wrong" he brings up that a muslim can believe in the marriage of a 9yo with a muslim (reffering to aisha most likely), completely misses the point that factual truth/lack thereof and moral right/wrong are two seperate concepts
He even claims otherwise

What is factual?
Factual is something that can objectively be proven/is objectively true
Neither right nor wrong in the sense of truth xan apply to an opinion as those are just subjective statements of one's stance on a certain topic and dont involve claims that could be untrue. If so, the claim is seperate from the opinion

Considering the moral question
Its still not necessarily wrong since
a subjective morality has no authority beyond the subject itself, I cannot apply my morality onto others as its not superior to theirs in any way
b objective morality would first have to be consensually agreed upon for him to make an "isnt this morally wrong" argument
This doesnt matter anyways because he specifically claims its factually wrong ("how is it not factually wrong?")

So believing in the marriage of 9yo children, which i assume means supporting it rather than just believing in it's existence, is not inherently wrong. Its neither wrong factually, which is what the whole point was, nor morally as long as no objective morality (one given by a higher authority) has been agreed upon or atleast the moral-giver's supremacy has been acknowledged
He is also obviously not aware of the basic logical and philosophical concept of burden of proof, which is upon him (since as it's original latin name says(translated), "the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies". Clearly I am the one who denies the positive claim, which is that the mentioned opinion is wrong).
For no claim he made there was any argument or proof given, and what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The emotional cucking is insane though, muh you hurt my feelings
grow tf up nigger I was trolling at the start but in the end he actually pissed me off so much

Just to correct the retards in his thread's reply section
broodal 124iq mog

Getting that emotional over a lil discussion online is kinda…yeah just kinda

 

[sensitive sapphire]

Getting that emotional over a lil discussion online is kinda…yeah just kinda

says a nigga who cried and pounded his feet over reps like a good little bitch that he is

 

[Scorpion]

says a nigga who cried and pounded his feet over reps like a good little bitch that he is

Nigga rep is rep thats a whole different story

Then i apologized even after all that to YOU
“Muh u already did what u want ur not coming to my birthday party”

 

[hippocamp]

Im gonna leave out the racebait at the beginning it was just trolling anyways look at sensitive sapphire's thread for that

First he asked me a question about my stance on (non-muslim) immigration

Spoiler: Stating my opinion

View attachment 49923
I was asked by him to give my opinion and so I did

In summary, (interracial/interethnic) immigration is always bad for a nation because it alters the ethnos, which is a nation's foundation.
Thats an opinion, there are other worldviews that for example argue a nation can also be based on a demos alone (civic nationalism) without concerns regarding ethnicity.

He instantly called me racist and again said he wasnt talking about muslims (cool ig who tf cares if theyre muslims?)

Spoiler: Claims without arguments

View attachment 49924
"Youre wrong about that"
*proceeds to not give any reason or argument why*
I say there is no wrong since opinions are subjective and cannot be ruled to be right or wrong objectively
"Some opinions are wrong" (logically impossible, hes too retarded to be able to differentiate between opinion and statement)
"Democracy is an(d) illusion"
Never even mentioned democracy, im probably the most antidemocratic guy here
He argues that because others cant control their race all the consequences of them being whatever race they are should be ignored
"No [to race realism,] we of all people should know that nobody had control over what they look like this is just racism"
Retarded take, race is not just about skin or even phenotype, lack of control doesnt prove or justify anything
Coping with racism as buzzword
Yes niggers are retarded and dont have the capability to live up to white society
He calls that racism but his sandnigger ass never experienced this en masse
This id not just based on myself as anecdote but also on what we know about intelligence and neurological differences

Spoiler: Opinions cannot be wrong

View attachment 49925
Me pointing out there was no mention of democracy and that opinions cannot be wrong
He thinks democracy is when opinions cant be wrong (simple logical conclusion)
As counterargument against "opinions cant be wrong" he brings up that a muslim can believe in the marriage of a 9yo with a muslim (reffering to aisha most likely), completely misses the point that factual truth/lack thereof and moral right/wrong are two seperate concepts
He even claims otherwise

What is factual?
Factual is something that can objectively be proven/is objectively true
Neither right nor wrong in the sense of truth xan apply to an opinion as those are just subjective statements of one's stance on a certain topic and dont involve claims that could be untrue. If so, the claim is seperate from the opinion

Considering the moral question
Its still not necessarily wrong since
a subjective morality has no authority beyond the subject itself, I cannot apply my morality onto others as its not superior to theirs in any way
b objective morality would first have to be consensually agreed upon for him to make an "isnt this morally wrong" argument
This doesnt matter anyways because he specifically claims its factually wrong ("how is it not factually wrong?")

So believing in the marriage of 9yo children, which i assume means supporting it rather than just believing in it's existence, is not inherently wrong. Its neither wrong factually, which is what the whole point was, nor morally as long as no objective morality (one given by a higher authority) has been agreed upon or atleast the moral-giver's supremacy has been acknowledged
He is also obviously not aware of the basic logical and philosophical concept of burden of proof, which is upon him (since as it's original latin name says(translated), "the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies". Clearly I am the one who denies the positive claim, which is that the mentioned opinion is wrong).
For no claim he made there was any argument or proof given, and what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The emotional cucking is insane though, muh you hurt my feelings
grow tf up nigger I was trolling at the start but in the end he actually pissed me off so much

Just to correct the retards in his thread's reply section
broodal 124iq mog

Idk who's right or who's wrong but what i definitely know is that this thread was very unnecessary and it kinda shows you're seeking validation and approval of others on this forum

 

[Scorpion]

Idk who's right or who's wrong but what i definitely know is that this thread was very unnecessary and it kinda shows you you're seeking validation and approval of others on this forum

Judenbänker yo lowkey…

 

[sensitive sapphire]

Nigga rep is rep thats a whole different story

Then i apologized even after all that to YOU
“Muh u already did what u want ur not coming to my birthday party”

do u even hear urself bro

 

[Scorpion]

do u even hear urself bro

Im joking bro

 

[hippocamp]

Idk who's right or who's wrong but what i definitely know is that this thread was very unnecessary and it kinda shows you're seeking validation and approval of others on this forum

If you had confidence on your opinions, and you actually thought you were right, the thought of making a thread like this wouldn't even cross your mind

 

[Scorpion]

 

[NorthAfricanRopemaxxer]

Im gonna leave out the racebait at the beginning it was just trolling anyways look at sensitive sapphire's thread for that

First he asked me a question about my stance on (non-muslim) immigration

Spoiler: Stating my opinion

View attachment 49923
I was asked by him to give my opinion and so I did

In summary, (interracial/interethnic) immigration is always bad for a nation because it alters the ethnos, which is a nation's foundation.
Thats an opinion, there are other worldviews that for example argue a nation can also be based on a demos alone (civic nationalism) without concerns regarding ethnicity.

He instantly called me racist and again said he wasnt talking about muslims (cool ig who tf cares if theyre muslims?)

Spoiler: Claims without arguments

View attachment 49924
"Youre wrong about that"
*proceeds to not give any reason or argument why*
I say there is no wrong since opinions are subjective and cannot be ruled to be right or wrong objectively
"Some opinions are wrong" (logically impossible, hes too retarded to be able to differentiate between opinion and statement)
"Democracy is an(d) illusion"
Never even mentioned democracy, im probably the most antidemocratic guy here
He argues that because others cant control their race all the consequences of them being whatever race they are should be ignored
"No [to race realism,] we of all people should know that nobody had control over what they look like this is just racism"
Retarded take, race is not just about skin or even phenotype, lack of control doesnt prove or justify anything
Coping with racism as buzzword
Yes niggers are retarded and dont have the capability to live up to white society
He calls that racism but his sandnigger ass never experienced this en masse
This id not just based on myself as anecdote but also on what we know about intelligence and neurological differences

Spoiler: Opinions cannot be wrong

View attachment 49925
Me pointing out there was no mention of democracy and that opinions cannot be wrong
He thinks democracy is when opinions cant be wrong (simple logical conclusion)
As counterargument against "opinions cant be wrong" he brings up that a muslim can believe in the marriage of a 9yo with a muslim (reffering to aisha most likely), completely misses the point that factual truth/lack thereof and moral right/wrong are two seperate concepts
He even claims otherwise

What is factual?
Factual is something that can objectively be proven/is objectively true
Neither right nor wrong in the sense of truth xan apply to an opinion as those are just subjective statements of one's stance on a certain topic and dont involve claims that could be untrue. If so, the claim is seperate from the opinion

Considering the moral question
Its still not necessarily wrong since
a subjective morality has no authority beyond the subject itself, I cannot apply my morality onto others as its not superior to theirs in any way
b objective morality would first have to be consensually agreed upon for him to make an "isnt this morally wrong" argument
This doesnt matter anyways because he specifically claims its factually wrong ("how is it not factually wrong?")

So believing in the marriage of 9yo children, which i assume means supporting it rather than just believing in it's existence, is not inherently wrong. Its neither wrong factually, which is what the whole point was, nor morally as long as no objective morality (one given by a higher authority) has been agreed upon or atleast the moral-giver's supremacy has been acknowledged
He is also obviously not aware of the basic logical and philosophical concept of burden of proof, which is upon him (since as it's original latin name says(translated), "the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies". Clearly I am the one who denies the positive claim, which is that the mentioned opinion is wrong).
For no claim he made there was any argument or proof given, and what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The emotional cucking is insane though, muh you hurt my feelings
grow tf up nigger I was trolling at the start but in the end he actually pissed me off so much

Just to correct the retards in his thread's reply section
broodal 124iq mog

Just be patient

Mark as solution

 

[kanyewestlover66]

funny that he called you racist when your framework applies to all nations regardless of race, whereas his has special considerations for different races (muslims) awknowledging a fundamental difference in people based on race. I mean i think were all racist but thats besides the point. In the scope of this conversation he was being way more racist than you.

Regardless love you both Judenbänker sensitive sapphire

 

[NorthAfricanRopemaxxer]

funny that he called you racist when your framework applies to all nations regardless of race, whereas his has special considerations for different races (muslims) awknowledging a fundamental difference in people based on race. I mean i think were all racist but thats besides the point. In the scope of this conversation he was being way more racist than you.

Regardless love you both Judenbänker sensitive sapphire

Are u the preet Church pope now ?

 

[kanyewestlover66]

Are u the preet Church pope now ?

voting closes in a few hours, we will see

 

[Judenbänker]

Idk who's right or who's wrong but what i definitely know is that this thread was very unnecessary and it kinda shows you're seeking validation and approval of others on this forum

Yeah I do
I dont need my name to be slandered
I have a small reputation to protect

 

[Jester4Foids]

ok

bump

 

[mirincristian]

what do u think of inter-european migration? (europeans migrating to other european countries)
obv excluding shitskin albanians

 

[sensitive sapphire]

funny that he called you racist when your framework applies to all nations regardless of race, whereas his has special considerations for different races (muslims) awknowledging a fundamental difference in people based on race. I mean i think were all racist but thats besides the point. In the scope of this conversation he was being way more racist than you.

Regardless love you both Judenbänker sensitive sapphire

muslims arent humans. i sadly live among them, hes far more racist than i am and we are good now. love u too bby

 

[hippocamp]

muslims arent humans. i sadly live among them, hes far more racist than i am and we are good now. love u too bby

yo whys that majority of the iranians I've met hate islam but 99% of iranians are muslim, like i met 2-3 persian girls and all of em were very hostile towards islam

 

[sensitive sapphire]

yo whys that majority of the iranians I've met hate islam but 99% of iranians are muslim, like i met 2-3 persian girls and all of em were very hostile towards islam

anyone whos not a muslim gets excuted in iran so no one can freely admit what they believe in to the goverment

 

[Judenbänker]

what do u think of inter-european migration? (europeans migrating to other european countries)
obv excluding shitskin albanians

Way better, in limited amount its fine because whites can easily assimilate into other white cultures. In large amounts however that wouldnt be okay either

 

[6ϛʇʇnqʎʇooqǝᴉʞoop]

what do u think of inter-european migration? (europeans migrating to other european countries)
obv excluding shitskin albanians

are us shitskin mediterreneans allowed? im a southern italian and get called arab anywhere else in europe but im basically white pwease let me in

 

[mirincristian]

are us shitskin mediterreneans allowed? im a southern italian and get called arab anywhere else in europe but im basically white pwease let me in

they could never make me hate you dookie <3

 

[Judenbänker]

are us shitskin mediterreneans allowed? im a southern italian and get called arab anywhere else in europe but im basically white pwease let me in

Bro is sicilian

 

[6ϛʇʇnqʎʇooqǝᴉʞoop]

Bro is sicilian

sicilian? noo saar i am guancho

 

[kanyewestlover66]

Bro is sicilian

sicillian storm incoming

Can i get muh gabagoo

 

[sensitive sapphire]

just let it go niggas

 

[kanyewestlover66]

just let it go niggas

jlign method

 

[sensitive sapphire]

jlign method

he cant change my mind and i cant change his, its pointless

 

[i_blame_oxytocin]

Obviously me not wanting brown people with 35iq points below my own flooding my nation makes him not wanting to be my friend anymore

Ngl i agreed with half of what you said in the argument
But since you present yourself so poorly and attack sapphire personally I can't say you won purely because of how you articulated yourself
Im on the middle here both of you said things i agree and disagree with

 

[sensitive sapphire]

Obviously me not wanting brown people with 35iq points below my own flooding my nation makes him not wanting to be my friend anymore

i_blame_oxytocin reped me and i just read this, i didnt mean those people i was talking about those who are actully beneficial to economy no matter their skin color

 

[PrinceND]

Im gonna leave out the racebait at the beginning it was just trolling anyways look at sensitive sapphire's thread for that

First he asked me a question about my stance on (non-muslim) immigration

Spoiler: Stating my opinion

View attachment 49923
I was asked by him to give my opinion and so I did

In summary, (interracial/interethnic) immigration is always bad for a nation because it alters the ethnos, which is a nation's foundation.
Thats an opinion, there are other worldviews that for example argue a nation can also be based on a demos alone (civic nationalism) without concerns regarding ethnicity.

He instantly called me racist and again said he wasnt talking about muslims (cool ig who tf cares if theyre muslims?)

Spoiler: Claims without arguments

View attachment 49924
"Youre wrong about that"
*proceeds to not give any reason or argument why*
I say there is no wrong since opinions are subjective and cannot be ruled to be right or wrong objectively
"Some opinions are wrong" (logically impossible, hes too retarded to be able to differentiate between opinion and statement)
"Democracy is an(d) illusion"
Never even mentioned democracy, im probably the most antidemocratic guy here
He argues that because others cant control their race all the consequences of them being whatever race they are should be ignored
"No [to race realism,] we of all people should know that nobody had control over what they look like this is just racism"
Retarded take, race is not just about skin or even phenotype, lack of control doesnt prove or justify anything
Coping with racism as buzzword
Yes niggers are retarded and dont have the capability to live up to white society
He calls that racism but his sandnigger ass never experienced this en masse
This id not just based on myself as anecdote but also on what we know about intelligence and neurological differences

Spoiler: Opinions cannot be wrong

View attachment 49925
Me pointing out there was no mention of democracy and that opinions cannot be wrong
He thinks democracy is when opinions cant be wrong (simple logical conclusion)
As counterargument against "opinions cant be wrong" he brings up that a muslim can believe in the marriage of a 9yo with a muslim (reffering to aisha most likely), completely misses the point that factual truth/lack thereof and moral right/wrong are two seperate concepts
He even claims otherwise

What is factual?
Factual is something that can objectively be proven/is objectively true
Neither right nor wrong in the sense of truth xan apply to an opinion as those are just subjective statements of one's stance on a certain topic and dont involve claims that could be untrue. If so, the claim is seperate from the opinion

Considering the moral question
Its still not necessarily wrong since
a subjective morality has no authority beyond the subject itself, I cannot apply my morality onto others as its not superior to theirs in any way
b objective morality would first have to be consensually agreed upon for him to make an "isnt this morally wrong" argument
This doesnt matter anyways because he specifically claims its factually wrong ("how is it not factually wrong?")

So believing in the marriage of 9yo children, which i assume means supporting it rather than just believing in it's existence, is not inherently wrong. Its neither wrong factually, which is what the whole point was, nor morally as long as no objective morality (one given by a higher authority) has been agreed upon or atleast the moral-giver's supremacy has been acknowledged
He is also obviously not aware of the basic logical and philosophical concept of burden of proof, which is upon him (since as it's original latin name says(translated), "the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies". Clearly I am the one who denies the positive claim, which is that the mentioned opinion is wrong).
For no claim he made there was any argument or proof given, and what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

The emotional cucking is insane though, muh you hurt my feelings
grow tf up nigger I was trolling at the start but in the end he actually pissed me off so much

Just to correct the retards in his thread's reply section
broodal 124iq mog

Nationalism is for cucks

 

[milad]

Dw i understand u. Same thing happend to me when we was debating and he cursed my and my family hes a dumbass

 

[sensitive sapphire]

Dw i understand u. Same thing happend to me when we was debating and he cursed my and my family hes a dumbass

u are one of the stupidest people ive ever seen, hes insulting ur race jfl. also i didnt insult him or his family retard read through the thread atleast

 

[Judenbänker]

Ngl i agreed with half of what you said in the argument
But since you present yourself so poorly and attack sapphire personally I can't say you won purely because of how you articulated yourself
Im on the middle here both of you said things i agree and disagree with

"You are obviously in the right but my emotional coping is too much"


Always the same with niggers