A graphically determined ratio that can change at a different angle doesn’t seem like it’s the most accurate
wait wait let me cope to test ur knowledge, what if u get a perfect picture?
Define perfect
perfect is as objective adjective meaning no camera zoom in or out perfect lens and distortion ? whats ur next argument ? (I know the answer to this i js wanna test u)
It would still be subjective measurement no? Ratios can change based on the angle of the photo. Probably wrong but wtvr
no ur not wrong but u dont have the whole picture as i said im js testing u and I agree but whats ur user on tiktok?
Why do u want it lawl
just curious since u knew about someone particular u gotta be niche
Nah I’m not niche, just a fan of tobppope. Don’t really post much stuff on there besides gaming clips
are u in the pillars association group?
alr well baruch hachem brother
ratios ≠ harmony, definitely the most important thing. why would this even be considered cope?
if you have bad ratios people will feel uncomfortable looking at your face
what do you think ratios are measuring besides how well your bones are developed compared to other bones?
ye but how is it accurate doe
lower than that
More accurate then measuring the ethmoid from the outside
just spend the 7k on a ct scan
I seriously doubt they did that for marius melbye
perfect bones shit ratios can still be htn, shit bones perfect ratios barely high ltn at best. Ratios matter but as long as they arent shit for example long ass midface or sfs your fine
partly. a lot of psl gods like ian and sean have sub 80% frontal harmony
70% harmony is easily 1/1000. Not even a little
Ratios can make or break your face
Activity
So far there's no one here
Users who are viewing this thread
Similar threads
