nettspend
ldaring
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2025
- Posts
- 2,196
- Reputation
- 4,056
Similar to my other thread but way more focused on the evolution and biological aspect.
Everyone loves to hide behind biology to justify hypergamy- specifically heightism. You can claim girls have sought more masculine, taller, stronger, and dominant men since the dawn of time, but that fucking entirely ignores how actual evolutionary stages work.
For example, the stone age, height was an actual function utility for survival, hence why women seeked for a tall man during such times. But now in 2026, it just resembles a luxury status symbol. Times have changed and we moved from "survival of the fittest" to "optimization of the elite" and it has done irreversible damage to the dating market.
The actual reality is that hypergamy has hijacked these inherited biologic traits and turned them into a smash or flop binary, since survival is no longer a factor in modern day society, these instincts have been weaponized as clout markers.
A girl being with a guy for his height isn't even about survival or protection anymore, its about the status they have for being with them in a world full of infinite options. We've allowed girls to develop a unrealistic and primitive preference to be inflated by a dating market where men offer a surplus of free attention, making the baseline for the average guy completely unrealistic.
And it goes further than that, the double standard is the actual proof, for example If a guy uses evolution to justify being attracted to younger women for fertility he's called a pedo or a creep. but if a girl uses evolution to justify heightism or demanding a top 1% provider its just "biological" only one side is allowed to use biology as a shield to move the goal posts.
We are being outcasted by stone age standards that have no functionalities or utility on modern day society. And its just going to continue being an endless loop that goes downhill because we keep subsidizing these standards with desperate validation.
The requirement will only get more unrealistic as time goes on, and the percentages will drop. We've already seen the most unrealistic jump in this generation, from when it use to be "oh he just has to be taller than me" to "oh he has to be at least 6 foot" and we aren't even doing anything to prevent them from changing these standards. We are letting them create these fantasies through our own past mistakes of giving too much attention making them think their perceived value is more than it really is. Now we are the ones who have to suffer from the drought.
realhmtn
Everyone loves to hide behind biology to justify hypergamy- specifically heightism. You can claim girls have sought more masculine, taller, stronger, and dominant men since the dawn of time, but that fucking entirely ignores how actual evolutionary stages work.
For example, the stone age, height was an actual function utility for survival, hence why women seeked for a tall man during such times. But now in 2026, it just resembles a luxury status symbol. Times have changed and we moved from "survival of the fittest" to "optimization of the elite" and it has done irreversible damage to the dating market.
The actual reality is that hypergamy has hijacked these inherited biologic traits and turned them into a smash or flop binary, since survival is no longer a factor in modern day society, these instincts have been weaponized as clout markers.
A girl being with a guy for his height isn't even about survival or protection anymore, its about the status they have for being with them in a world full of infinite options. We've allowed girls to develop a unrealistic and primitive preference to be inflated by a dating market where men offer a surplus of free attention, making the baseline for the average guy completely unrealistic.
And it goes further than that, the double standard is the actual proof, for example If a guy uses evolution to justify being attracted to younger women for fertility he's called a pedo or a creep. but if a girl uses evolution to justify heightism or demanding a top 1% provider its just "biological" only one side is allowed to use biology as a shield to move the goal posts.
We are being outcasted by stone age standards that have no functionalities or utility on modern day society. And its just going to continue being an endless loop that goes downhill because we keep subsidizing these standards with desperate validation.
The requirement will only get more unrealistic as time goes on, and the percentages will drop. We've already seen the most unrealistic jump in this generation, from when it use to be "oh he just has to be taller than me" to "oh he has to be at least 6 foot" and we aren't even doing anything to prevent them from changing these standards. We are letting them create these fantasies through our own past mistakes of giving too much attention making them think their perceived value is more than it really is. Now we are the ones who have to suffer from the drought.
realhmtn
