back to white america
Ik what it is bruh but the thing is that if you do not include a highly variant testing group the results could be a little blurredHave you ever heard about what a "representative study" is?
Not necessarily as there are safe ways to estimate and project but whatever there wont be a higher discrepancy than 5iqpoints
Still 94 is then a good approximation for 100 you need more than one study to make a whole claim one study won't make much
You havent even looked at the study on the first page it already cites over a dozen other studies retard
I didn't lol but there are whole books and many studies that say using one representative study for humanity is retarded such as: Intelligence knowns and Unknowns, Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments, Sorry, wrong numbers: An analysis of a study of intelligence and What Is Intelligence? Beyond the Flynn Effect
1. I know you used an ai to search for those studies
2. mirin the honesty
3. retarded argument since again I didnt just rely on one study neither does Lynn
Well it was one study prob cause the link ain't there for me to look at and yeah I looked with an AI cause I am too lazy but I read a bit of them and they dont seem to be paradoxical to my argument
Youre aware that one study is not = 1 study? Sure its a single study but it cites dozens of others thats how it works nigga
I dont get your argument at all because I never gave only one study as evidence to begin with
I know but then I can also say that they used many studies cause many studies have references for them to publish one and studies that have many studies and then being reviewed is a meta anlysis
And I looked at ur original reply and I saw that u said a 2016 study
a 2010 study which I linked which then cites several other studies
As I already explained one study =/= one study
It is technically one study but it states and cites many others it's one with many citations and other individual studies getting cited
thats the whole fucking point its TECHNICALLY one study but AT THE SAME TIME its a COLLECTION of multiple studies what is your point iqlet
It's a collection but still one study tho
I could also use a normal study and look at the citations and now I have 100+ studies lol
Did I ever say its not one study
The fact that its a collection and actually links other individual studies makes it equal to several studies in one as it is exactly that
It would be only one study and not several as well if there were no citations
Yeah exactly if theyre linked ptl thats literally how it works
Yeah then I can say i have many studies on that but if it's a reference on the bottom then it's not a collection of many studies it would have said meta analysis cause U need some typa reference to be valid and not be accused of pulling that outta ur ass
A reference at the bottom is not a citation and if you now had taken a look at the study you wouldve found out that they directly link the study and the page(s) in the main text
gonna go crazy talking to you and yeah okay maybe the appropriate term is not collection but meta analysis idrc as Im not a native english speaker fact is that "one" study includes dozens more
And also studies have to do that and I am not English either and if it's a meta analysis then then it's a secondary source not primary and that study then doesn't have as much arguing power
Thanks for the bumps jesus christ
Activity
So far there's no one here
Users who are viewing this thread
Similar threads
