High/quadrangular lefort 1 for anterior facial depth enhancement (3 Viewers)

[gonioncel38]

I've recently been looking into getting a high/quadrangular lefort 1 instead of a standard one for bimax (mainly due to the ability to influence the paranasal area and perhaps move some of the piriform aperture for a better result facial depth wise, so I dont end up "dogmaxxed" like some do from standard lf1) and was wondering if anyone on here had any experience with the procedure/reputable surgeon recommendations - little info is available online about this variation.

Some people on .org have been mentioning a lefort 2 to fully maximise anterior facial depth, but if I'm being honest its probably not a realistic option in non syndrome cases. Thus, it seems to me that this is the next best option, especially considering how "stuck on" some implants (paranasal, infraorbital etc) can look when trying to enhance upper midface projection and anterior facial depth as a whole.

So, if anyone has done this or is in the process of doing so, please shed some light on it, and if anyone has any better alternatives to suggest please do so.

 

[qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn]

most of the user in here didn't do any surgery maybe they do have the knowledge to answer this

───────────────────────────

@Jester4Foids @i_blame_oxytocin @dookiebootybutt59 @User123 @whatisbp @nineteen

 

[Sploinkus_]

Dr. Taban

 

[Jester4Foids]

most of the user in here didn't do any surgery maybe they do have the knowledge to answer this

───────────────────────────

@Jester4Foids @i_blame_oxytocin @dookiebootybutt59 @User123 @whatisbp @nineteen

mirin tag, tldr the op msg tho i wont be reading taht

 

[nineteen]

I've recently been looking into getting a high/quadrangular lefort 1 instead of a standard one for bimax (mainly due to the ability to influence the paranasal area and perhaps move some of the piriform aperture for a better result facial depth wise, so I dont end up "dogmaxxed" like some do from standard lf1) and was wondering if anyone on here had any experience with the procedure/reputable surgeon recommendations - little info is available online about this variation.

Some people on .org have been mentioning a lefort 2 to fully maximise anterior facial depth, but if I'm being honest its probably not a realistic option in non syndrome cases. Thus, it seems to me that this is the next best option, especially considering how "stuck on" some implants (paranasal, infraorbital etc) can look when trying to enhance upper midface projection and anterior facial depth as a whole.

So, if anyone has done this or is in the process of doing so, please shed some light on it, and if anyone has any better alternatives to suggest please do so.

anything more than a lf1 is unrealistic in most cases. most doctors will only do it if the subject has a severe craniofacial issue.

id ask a surgeon about the quadrangular lf1 instead of asking anyone here.. i don't think anyone has experience with leforts here, though i will be writing a thread on every lefort in depth, so ill bookmark this and maybe add it to my thread.

 

[B63548]

just find a good surgeon in your city with ai and tell them fix your focking face

 

[B63548]

find the issues in your face and tell them whats missing and they will recomend you the best surgery

 

[NoBONES]

most of the user in here didn't do any surgery maybe they do have the knowledge to answer this

───────────────────────────

@Jester4Foids @i_blame_oxytocin @dookiebootybutt59 @User123 @whatisbp @nineteen

combined iq of 200

 

[sm-52]

I've recently been looking into getting a high/quadrangular lefort 1 instead of a standard one for bimax (mainly due to the ability to influence the paranasal area and perhaps move some of the piriform aperture for a better result facial depth wise, so I dont end up "dogmaxxed" like some do from standard lf1) and was wondering if anyone on here had any experience with the procedure/reputable surgeon recommendations - little info is available online about this variation.

Some people on .org have been mentioning a lefort 2 to fully maximise anterior facial depth, but if I'm being honest its probably not a realistic option in non syndrome cases. Thus, it seems to me that this is the next best option, especially considering how "stuck on" some implants (paranasal, infraorbital etc) can look when trying to enhance upper midface projection and anterior facial depth as a whole.

So, if anyone has done this or is in the process of doing so, please shed some light on it, and if anyone has any better alternatives to suggest please do so.

Go post this on jaw surgery forums

 

[Hexumㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ]

most of the user in here didn't do any surgery maybe they do have the knowledge to answer this

───────────────────────────

@Jester4Foids @i_blame_oxytocin @dookiebootybutt59 @User123 @whatisbp @nineteen

horrible people to tag

 

[Acumenis]

I've recently been looking into getting a high/quadrangular lefort 1 instead of a standard one for bimax (mainly due to the ability to influence the paranasal area and perhaps move some of the piriform aperture for a better result facial depth wise, so I dont end up "dogmaxxed" like some do from standard lf1) and was wondering if anyone on here had any experience with the procedure/reputable surgeon recommendations - little info is available online about this variation.

Some people on .org have been mentioning a lefort 2 to fully maximise anterior facial depth, but if I'm being honest its probably not a realistic option in non syndrome cases. Thus, it seems to me that this is the next best option, especially considering how "stuck on" some implants (paranasal, infraorbital etc) can look when trying to enhance upper midface projection and anterior facial depth as a whole.

So, if anyone has done this or is in the process of doing so, please shed some light on it, and if anyone has any better alternatives to suggest please do so.

Nigga posted this on a gooner forum 99% of users here didnt understood what you said
Also take a CBCT scan of your skull contact multiple reputable surgeon and ask them if they can do a high lf1 then most of the time they will do a 3d simulation of the surgery so you can see pretty much how it will affect your face and you can adjust if needed

 

[B63548]

combined iq of 200

bro i got 75 iq i was tested irl

 

[B63548]

we prob like 450 iq combined

 

[NoBONES]

bro i got 75 iq i was tested irl

WISC?

 

[sm-52]

bro i got 75 iq i was tested irl

High iq chad

 

[Persona]

Dogmaxxed bimax faces are because over advancement not the bimax itself. To maximize anterior facial deph you also need implants.

 

[B63548]

WISC?

whats that

 

[surgerymax]

standard lf1 + implants is superior , theres no reason to do a less stable higher cut

 

[Mr. Oxytocin]

combined iq of 200

brother

 

[Mr. Oxytocin]

Go post this on jaw surgery forums

hey bro can i get 1 jaw surgery
no sorry we're all sold out we have some jaw implants tho
no ill go to the jaw surgery forum and see if anyone has a spare one

 

[Mr. Oxytocin]

most of the user in here didn't do any surgery maybe they do have the knowledge to answer this

───────────────────────────

@Jester4Foids @i_blame_oxytocin @dookiebootybutt59 @User123 @whatisbp @nineteen

dude tagged me like i'd say anything helpful

 

[sm-52]

hey bro can i get 1 jaw surgery
no sorry we're all sold out we have some jaw implants tho
no ill go to the jaw surgery forum and see if anyone has a spare one

The forum is literally called jaw surgery forums . Com shut the fuck up

 

[Mr. Oxytocin]

The forum is literally called jaw surgery forums . Com shut the fuck up

i was just having fun im sorry

 

[qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn]

i was just having fun im sorry

lol this guy is you but more og I'd sayz dont be sorry lol