Discussion Hernan de la cruz ethnic cope DEBUNKED (1 Viewer)

[inhibitioncel]

Your actually a rerard if you think this guy is white , shoot yourself

classifying someone as white is subjective, users like you should get banned.

 

[Godveil Heir]

youve been absolutely nothing, i debunked the pinned thread already.

you didn't debunk jackshit

go on and give us your retarded reason to how it disproves the existence of phenotype?

 

[Hide]

you didn't debunk jackshit

go on and give us your retarded reason to how it disproves the existence of phenotype?

Yo this is off topic but what does the gold verification badge mean

 

[Hide]

Most followers I think

Circadex also has it

 

[Godveil Heir]

Yo this is off topic but what does the gold verification badge mean

Rank 1 on any leaderboard

I got mine by being rank 1 on the Solution leaderboard
you got yours by followers leader-board
circa by rep & messages

 

[Ascension]

Yeah I just realised

Circadex also has it

 

[Hide]

Rank 1 on any leaderboard

I got mine by being rank 1 on the Solution leaderboard
you got yours by followers leader-board
circa by rep & messages

Fire

 

[inhibitioncel]

you didn't debunk jackshit

go on and give us your retarded reason to how it disproves the existence of phenotype?

ive never ever said that phenos dont exist, i only said that the way that OP was classifying was BS.

alfredo his cupid bow, nose shape, ear shape, eyebrow shape and last name alligns with the west alpinid phenotype.

stop embarrassing yourself and take reading lessons.

 

[Godveil Heir]

ive never ever said that phenos dont exist, i only said that the way that OP was classifying was BS.

alfredo his cupid bow, nose shape, ear shape, eyebrow shape and last name alligns with the west alpinid phenotype.

stop embarrassing yourself and take reading lessons.

it's decent classification

and you didn't even criticize that first
you just started larping as to why it's muh deboonked

 

[inhibitioncel]

it's decent classification

no

and you didn't even criticize that first

so stop using your imagination moron

you just started larping as to why it's muh deboonked

"larping", ive debunked his way of classifying and thats it.

 

[Godveil Heir]

no


so stop using your imagination moron



"larping", ive debunked his way of classifying and thats it.

giving your opinion ≠ debunking you spastic retard

and all you reasoning was bunch of mumbo jumbo with nothing to do with your criticism of the validity of the classification

 

[tmpll]

 

[inhibitioncel]

giving your opinion ≠ debunking you spastic retardYou when i give my proof:

and all you reasoning was bunch of mumbo jumbo with nothing to do with your criticism of the validity of the classification

"mumbo jumbo" whilst is being backed by science

 

[Godveil Heir]

stop putting your response inside the quote

and posting random links after asking gpt for keywords doesn't mean anything

0 reasoning

 

[dior]

Fire

Were lowk redoing it and you couldve just hovered over it to find out what it meant jfl

 

[Godveil Heir]

Were lowk redoing it and you couldve just hovered over it to find out what it meant jfl

too complicated for him

 

[inhibitioncel]

stop putting your response inside the quote

and posting random links after asking gpt for keywords doesn't mean anything

0 reasoning

read em.
how about you give me proof of why his unreliable method is actually the "way"?

 

[carbon]

hes obviously white why was i tagged in this?

 

[Godveil Heir]

read em.
how about you give me proof of why his unreliable method is actually the "way"?

because he was successful in showing the difference between different features across diff phenotypes? jfl
stop your retard ramblings if you have no argument

posting random irrelevant gpt sources after searching keywords doesn't prove anything idiot
get evidence hierarchy & reasoning in check or just stfu

 

[inhibitioncel]

because he was successful in showing the difference between different features across diff phenotypes? jfl
stop your retard ramblings if you have no argument

posting random irrelevant gpt sources after searching keywords doesn't prove anything idiot
get evidence hierarchy & reasoning in check or just stfu

Quantitative craniometrical traits have been successfully incorporated into population genetic methods to provide insight into human population structure. However, little is known about the degree of genetic and non-genetic influences on the phenotypic expression of functionally based traits. Many studies have assessed the heritability of craniofacial traits, but complex patterns of correlation among traits have been disregarded. This is a pitfall as the human skull is strongly integrated. Here we reconsider the evolutionary potential of craniometric traits by assessing their heritability values as well as their patterns of genetic and phenotypic correlation using a large pedigree-structured skull series from Hallstatt (Austria). The sample includes 355 complete adult skulls that have been analysed using 3D geometric morphometric techniques. Heritability estimates for 58 cranial linear distances were computed using maximum likelihood methods. These distances were assigned to the main functional and developmental regions of the skull. Results showed that the human skull has substantial amounts of genetic variation, and a t-test showed that there are no statistically significant differences among the heritabilities of facial, neurocranial and basal dimensions. However, skull evolvability is limited by complex patterns of genetic correlation. Phenotypic and genetic patterns of correlation are consistent but do not support traditional hypotheses of integration of the human shape, showing that the classification between brachy- and dolicephalic skulls is not grounded on the genetic level. Here we support previous findings in the mouse cranium and provide empirical evidence that covariation between the maximum widths of the main developmental regions of the skull is the dominant factor of integration in the human skull.

just say you didnt read em fucking idiot, get your science together or just log off

 

[Godveil Heir]

Quantitative craniometrical traits have been successfully incorporated into population genetic methods to provide insight into human population structure. However, little is known about the degree of genetic and non-genetic influences on the phenotypic expression of functionally based traits. Many studies have assessed the heritability of craniofacial traits, but complex patterns of correlation among traits have been disregarded. This is a pitfall as the human skull is strongly integrated. Here we reconsider the evolutionary potential of craniometric traits by assessing their heritability values as well as their patterns of genetic and phenotypic correlation using a large pedigree-structured skull series from Hallstatt (Austria). The sample includes 355 complete adult skulls that have been analysed using 3D geometric morphometric techniques. Heritability estimates for 58 cranial linear distances were computed using maximum likelihood methods. These distances were assigned to the main functional and developmental regions of the skull. Results showed that the human skull has substantial amounts of genetic variation, and a t-test showed that there are no statistically significant differences among the heritabilities of facial, neurocranial and basal dimensions. However, skull evolvability is limited by complex patterns of genetic correlation. Phenotypic and genetic patterns of correlation are consistent but do not support traditional hypotheses of integration of the human shape, showing that the classification between brachy- and dolicephalic skulls is not grounded on the genetic level. Here we support previous findings in the mouse cranium and provide empirical evidence that covariation between the maximum widths of the main developmental regions of the skull is the dominant factor of integration in the human skull.

just say you didnt read em fucking idiot, get your science together or just log off

dnr this gpt slop

you can't even articulate your point
fuck off

 

[Godveil Heir]

didn't you read my gpt keyword slop
I'm not gona articulate ofc\

 

[inhibitioncel]

dnr this gpt slop

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19166470/
yeah from gpt...

you can't even articulate your point
fuck off

i articulated my points several times very clearly but you cant stop missreading my arguments.

smh you came up that i said that phenos didnt exist? dont know how you got that but sure..

and now youre trynna claim that anyone from a certain population will have the "same" crane.

youre an embarrassment

 

[Godveil Heir]

i articulated my points several times very clearly but you cant stop missreading my arguments.

you didn't articulate shit

just larped bunch of irrelevant stuff then attached 5 links at the end

you're supposed to backup your claims with linking studies and explaining their relevancy
but you're a 90IQ idiot so no wonder you're incapable of debate

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19166470/
yeah from gpt...

omg, is that just pubmed keyword, wow
gpt could never

kill yourself fag

smh you came up that i said that phenos didnt exist? dont know how you got that but sure..

you replied under the thread about phenotypes.
quote

how are people agreeing with this bullshit
all of yall got 0 logical thinking
this pseudoscience has been debunked by modern anthropologists ages ago.​

so ofc that'll be the meaning
but a retard like you will start barking irrelevant stuff

and now youre trynna claim that anyone from a certain population will have the "same" crane.

most will
you fucking idiot
that's why you look at people and are able to guess where they are from


holy retard
should've banned you long ago instead of responding to cattle like you

 

[inhibitioncel]

you didn't articulate shit

just larped bunch of irrelevant stuff then attached 5 links at the end

why should i recite studies when you can just click on em?

omg, is that just pubmed keyword, wow
gpt could never

most studies in general are on pubmed, 90% of your gear information comes off pubmed.

you replied under the thread about phenotypes.
quote


so ofc that'll be the meaning

any normal human being would acknowledge the existence of phenotypes since its literally morphological traits.

but a retard like you will start barking irrelevant stuff

recite me the "irrevelevant" stuff

that's why you look at people and are able to guess where they are from

thats based off average coloring which gives a rough estimate but isnt precise enough.

holy retard
should've banned you long ago instead of responding to cattle like you

guess who yall just affiliated with, loads of smart people like me.

im still waiting on your proof btw..