Discussion Full frontal analysis of dirtbagteenager (1 Viewer)

[DirtbagTeenager]

How to improve I know this inaccurate and I’m obviously not chad how to fix this

Doesn’t include asymmetry in misc

Misc or dimo

| Ratio # | Measurement Parameter | Calculated Metric | Chart Ideal Standard | Chart Bracket Range | Earned Matrix Tier |


|---|---|---|---|---|---|


| 01 | Vertical Facial Thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.08 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 29.5\% - 36.5\% | T1 (Elite) |


| 02 | Horizontal Facial Fifths | 1.02 : 1 : 1.08 : 0.96 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 | Near-Equal Distribution | T1 (Elite) |


| 03 | Total Height-to-Width (FWHR) | 1.35 | 1.33 - 1.38 | 1.33 - 1.38 | T1 (Elite) |


| 04 | Midface Ratio | 0.98 | 0.95 - 1.00 | 1.90 - 2.06 (FWHR scale) | T1 (Elite) |


| 05 | Midface-to-Total Height | 0.375 | 0.35 - 0.38 | Ideal Compact Third | T1 (Elite) |


| 06 | Interocular-to-Eye Width | 1.19 | 1.00 | 44.3\% - 47.7\% Spread | T1 (Elite) |


| 07 | Eye Width-to-Face Width | 0.208 | 0.200 | 0.200 Standard | T1 (Elite) |


| 08 | Intercanthal-to-Nasal Width | 0.926 | 1.000 | Near 1:1 Alignment | T2 (High) |


| 09 | Nasal Width-to-Face Width | 0.267 | 0.250 - 0.280 | Fits Central Fifth | T1 (Elite) |


| 10 | Mouth Width-to-Nasal Width | 1.41 | 1.500 | 1.40 - 1.55 | T2 (High) |


| 11 | Upper-to-Lower Lip Ratio | 0.56 (1 : 1.80) | 0.625 (1 : 1.60) | 0.50 - 0.65 | T2 (High) |


| 12 | Palpebral Fissure Symmetry | 1.05 | 1.000 | <5\% Variance | T1 (Elite) |


| 13 | Jaw-to-Cheekbone (Bigonial) | 0.844 (84.4\%) | 85.5\% - 92\% | 83.5\% - 94\% | T2 (High) |


| 14 | Midface Line-to-Width Align | 0.435 | 0.400 - 0.450 | Balanced Midface Vector | T1 (Elite) |


| 15 | Philtrum-to-Chin Ratio | 1 : 2.00 | 2.05 - 2.55 (Chart) | 1.87 - 2.73 | T2 (High) |


| 16 | Palpebral Height-to-IPD | 0.167 | 0.150 - 0.200 | Compact Eye Aspect | T1 (Elite) |


| 17 | Nose-to-Mouth Width Ratio | 0.71 (1 : 1.41) | 0.660 (1 : 1.50) | 0.68 - 0.73 | T2 (High) |


| 18 | Forehead-to-Cheekbone Ratio | 0.88 | 0.850 - 0.900 | Optimal Upper Taper | T1 (Elite) |


| 19 | Nasal Base-to-Facial Width | 0.267 | 0.250 - 0.280 | Central Fifth Fit | T1 (Elite) |


| 20 | Intercanthal-to-Nasal Base | 0.926 | 1.000 | Balanced Inner Width | T2 (High) |


| 21 | Nose Length-to-Face Width | 0.356 | 0.330 - 0.380 | Proportional Projection | T1 (Elite) |


| 22 | Intercanthal-to-Face Width | 0.248 (1 : 4.03) | 0.250 (1 : 4.00) | Exact 1:4 Ratio | T1 (Elite) |


| 23 | Outer Canthal-to-Face Width | 0.683 | 0.650 - 0.700 | Ideal Ocular Framing | T1 (Elite) |


| 24 | Canthal Vector Differential | 0.05 | 0.000 | Minimal Midface Shift | T2 (High) |


| 25 | Lower Jaw Vector Variance | 0.05 | 0.000 | Natural Bilateral Shift | T2 (High) |


| 26 | Ocular-to-Oral Vector Balance | 0.952 | 1.000 | Central Alignment | T1 (Elite) |


| 27 | Eyebrow-to-IPD Coverage | 0.729 | 0.700 - 0.750 | Ideal Orbital Framing | T1 (Elite) |


| 28 | Lateral Canthal Tilt (^{\circ}) | +0.04 (+6.2^{\circ}) | 5.2^{\circ} - 8.5^{\circ} | 5.2^{\circ} - 8.5^{\circ} Top Bracket | T1 (Elite) |


| 29 | Eye Height-to-Width Ratio | 0.261 (1 : 3.83) | 0.250 - 0.330 | Compact Hooded Shape | T1 (Elite) |


| 30 | Nasal Base-to-Chin Width | 1.00 (1 : 1) | 1.000 | Perfect 1:1 Correspondence | T1 (Elite) |


| 31 | Inner Canthus Drop Symmetry | 1.00 | 1.000 | Zero Variance (100\%) | T1 (Elite) |


| 32 | Pupil-to-Commissure Drop | 0.963 | 1.000 | Near-Zero Shift | T1 (Elite) |


Overall Tier Distribution


* Tier 1 (Elite / Target Brackets): 23 out of 32 parameters (71.9\%) hit the top mathematical bracket or exact single-point ideal.


* Tier 2 (High Harmony Brackets): 9 out of 32 parameters (28.1\%) sit in the second-highest bracket, representing minor biological variances without structural disruption.

 

[cold]

u used a bad picture to analyse, and i eyeball 70s (still a good harmony) i dont think its on the 85s

 

[Skull]

How to improve I know this inaccurate and I’m obviously not chad how to fix this

Doesn’t include asymmetry in misc

Misc or dimo


View attachment 65752

| Ratio # | Measurement Parameter | Calculated Metric | Chart Ideal Standard | Chart Bracket Range | Earned Matrix Tier |


|---|---|---|---|---|---|


| 01 | Vertical Facial Thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.08 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 29.5\% - 36.5\% | T1 (Elite) |


| 02 | Horizontal Facial Fifths | 1.02 : 1 : 1.08 : 0.96 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 | Near-Equal Distribution | T1 (Elite) |


| 03 | Total Height-to-Width (FWHR) | 1.35 | 1.33 - 1.38 | 1.33 - 1.38 | T1 (Elite) |


| 04 | Midface Ratio | 0.98 | 0.95 - 1.00 | 1.90 - 2.06 (FWHR scale) | T1 (Elite) |


| 05 | Midface-to-Total Height | 0.375 | 0.35 - 0.38 | Ideal Compact Third | T1 (Elite) |


| 06 | Interocular-to-Eye Width | 1.19 | 1.00 | 44.3\% - 47.7\% Spread | T1 (Elite) |


| 07 | Eye Width-to-Face Width | 0.208 | 0.200 | 0.200 Standard | T1 (Elite) |


| 08 | Intercanthal-to-Nasal Width | 0.926 | 1.000 | Near 1:1 Alignment | T2 (High) |


| 09 | Nasal Width-to-Face Width | 0.267 | 0.250 - 0.280 | Fits Central Fifth | T1 (Elite) |


| 10 | Mouth Width-to-Nasal Width | 1.41 | 1.500 | 1.40 - 1.55 | T2 (High) |


| 11 | Upper-to-Lower Lip Ratio | 0.56 (1 : 1.80) | 0.625 (1 : 1.60) | 0.50 - 0.65 | T2 (High) |


| 12 | Palpebral Fissure Symmetry | 1.05 | 1.000 | <5\% Variance | T1 (Elite) |


| 13 | Jaw-to-Cheekbone (Bigonial) | 0.844 (84.4\%) | 85.5\% - 92\% | 83.5\% - 94\% | T2 (High) |


| 14 | Midface Line-to-Width Align | 0.435 | 0.400 - 0.450 | Balanced Midface Vector | T1 (Elite) |


| 15 | Philtrum-to-Chin Ratio | 1 : 2.00 | 2.05 - 2.55 (Chart) | 1.87 - 2.73 | T2 (High) |


| 16 | Palpebral Height-to-IPD | 0.167 | 0.150 - 0.200 | Compact Eye Aspect | T1 (Elite) |


| 17 | Nose-to-Mouth Width Ratio | 0.71 (1 : 1.41) | 0.660 (1 : 1.50) | 0.68 - 0.73 | T2 (High) |


| 18 | Forehead-to-Cheekbone Ratio | 0.88 | 0.850 - 0.900 | Optimal Upper Taper | T1 (Elite) |


| 19 | Nasal Base-to-Facial Width | 0.267 | 0.250 - 0.280 | Central Fifth Fit | T1 (Elite) |


| 20 | Intercanthal-to-Nasal Base | 0.926 | 1.000 | Balanced Inner Width | T2 (High) |


| 21 | Nose Length-to-Face Width | 0.356 | 0.330 - 0.380 | Proportional Projection | T1 (Elite) |


| 22 | Intercanthal-to-Face Width | 0.248 (1 : 4.03) | 0.250 (1 : 4.00) | Exact 1:4 Ratio | T1 (Elite) |


| 23 | Outer Canthal-to-Face Width | 0.683 | 0.650 - 0.700 | Ideal Ocular Framing | T1 (Elite) |


| 24 | Canthal Vector Differential | 0.05 | 0.000 | Minimal Midface Shift | T2 (High) |


| 25 | Lower Jaw Vector Variance | 0.05 | 0.000 | Natural Bilateral Shift | T2 (High) |


| 26 | Ocular-to-Oral Vector Balance | 0.952 | 1.000 | Central Alignment | T1 (Elite) |


| 27 | Eyebrow-to-IPD Coverage | 0.729 | 0.700 - 0.750 | Ideal Orbital Framing | T1 (Elite) |


| 28 | Lateral Canthal Tilt (^{\circ}) | +0.04 (+6.2^{\circ}) | 5.2^{\circ} - 8.5^{\circ} | 5.2^{\circ} - 8.5^{\circ} Top Bracket | T1 (Elite) |


| 29 | Eye Height-to-Width Ratio | 0.261 (1 : 3.83) | 0.250 - 0.330 | Compact Hooded Shape | T1 (Elite) |


| 30 | Nasal Base-to-Chin Width | 1.00 (1 : 1) | 1.000 | Perfect 1:1 Correspondence | T1 (Elite) |


| 31 | Inner Canthus Drop Symmetry | 1.00 | 1.000 | Zero Variance (100\%) | T1 (Elite) |


| 32 | Pupil-to-Commissure Drop | 0.963 | 1.000 | Near-Zero Shift | T1 (Elite) |


Overall Tier Distribution


* Tier 1 (Elite / Target Brackets): 23 out of 32 parameters (71.9\%) hit the top mathematical bracket or exact single-point ideal.


* Tier 2 (High Harmony Brackets): 9 out of 32 parameters (28.1\%) sit in the second-highest bracket, representing minor biological variances without structural disruption.

You need to be lil more away from the camera if yk what i mean but cool!

 

[DirtbagTeenager]

u used a bad picture to analyse, and i eyeball 70s (still a good harmony) i dont think its on the 85s

First time so I’m still learning but I’ll do another aware. I’m about 5 feet from the camera. Is that good then I’ll do a side profile harmony and mask. I had to go to work so I couldn’t finish.

 

[DirtbagTeenager]

Once I get better at it, DM me for a free analysis so I could finally make the thread I’ve been wanting to about who’s the best looking in the form and then I wanna put a sub class if they ascend or if they were genetically blessed

 

[DirtbagTeenager]

You need to be lil more away from the camera if yk what i mean but cool!

Would this be ideal images? Or retake further

I’m standing about 6 feet away

 

[cold]

Once I get better at it, DM me for a free analysis so I could finally make the thread I’ve been wanting to about who’s the best looking in the form and then I wanna put a sub class if they ascend or if they were genetically blessed

cant wait for it

View attachment 65767
View attachment 65768
Would this be ideal images? Or retake further

I’m standing about 6 feet away

a lot better

 

[DirtbagTeenager]

cant wait for it


a lot better

I’ll see what I can do and I’ll do Dimo, angularity, misc,

 

[Skull]

View attachment 65767
View attachment 65768
Would this be ideal images? Or retake further

I’m standing about 6 feet away

More better

 

[DirtbagTeenager]

More better

Not sure what else I could really do to make the frontal shot better