Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Serious freedom of speech or civil discourse

vote


  • Total voters
    13

angelo

nicecel
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Posts
157
Reputation
243
if a person a says the n word 10 times in the title and then posts it thats just retarded
but if a person posts raical realism with studies and statistics both and just offensive to the ethnicity
but ones reality and factual and not prejudice
Your English is a little broken, but I'm assuming you're saying, if somebody talks about racialist stuff with evidence, it shouldn't be affected, but if they're being overtly racist with no meaning, they should be stopped?
 

Redd harlow

I mog you and shot you nigger.
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Posts
205
Reputation
249
Yes,but shouldn’t be like the censorship of .com where you can literally get banned from having a Richard Ramirez Avi.
looksmaxxing.com is a failed social experiment moral of the story; never let foids in a manosphere of improvement
all there is just girl selling their nudes and flirting with mods while the actual "looksmaxxing" is non existent except the greycels asking to rate them with the snapchat filters and crying when they get rated below htn :cagerage:
 

Redd harlow

I mog you and shot you nigger.
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Posts
205
Reputation
249
Your English is a little broken, but I'm assuming you're saying, if somebody talks about racialist stuff with evidence, it shouldn't be affected, but if they're being overtly racist with no meaning, they should be stopped?
yes most people people will never accept it and consider it mean
 

Judenbänker

Nutz die Gojim aus wie Vieh
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
565
Reputation
793
if a person a says the n word 10 times in the title and then posts it thats just retarded
but if a person posts raical realism with studies and statistics both and just offensive to the ethnicity
but ones reality and factual and not prejudice
Both should be allowed to post (in their respective subs), even if one is low effort and low iq then the forum just wont give positive feedback. We must let the market be free for our economy to strive, if you only post slop your ratio will get fucked up and noones gonna take you serious, slowly driving you out of the forums daily life its gonna fix itself over time.
 

Redd harlow

I mog you and shot you nigger.
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Posts
205
Reputation
249
Both should be allowed to post (in their respective subs), even if one is low effort and low iq then the forum just wont give positive feedback. We must let the market be free for our economy to strive, if you only post slop your ratio will get fucked up and noones gonna take you serious, slowly driving you out of the forums daily life its gonna fix itself over time.
agreed thats the way
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
1. Who will evaluate what is and what isnt civil discourse (probably mods so Im gonna expect lots of modabuse / people who think there is modabuse)
We can try to be fair, I think at some point the tradeoff of potential mod-abuse might just be worth it for the overall quality of the forum.
also, we do have debates about warning/bans pretty often
and users would get warnings not just a direct ban so they can avoid mod-abuse being undetected by being a bit careful.
Every low selfesteem nigger is gonna cuck himself into being the victim of insults/harassment or whatever just because his buttfucked ass cant stand others having a) different opinions on a topic b) more knowledge disproving his own or c) rated him a way he didnt want/expect which is gonna suck both for the community experience and mods who are gonna get countless reports
dw about reports volume, pretty easy to resolve em up. we already have them people complaining about it, but easily manageable.
If this forum grows, we can just recruit more staff members.
that's not an issue.
As for the low esteem nigga being butthurt,
Mods are the ones who're going to decide
also, as long as people don't go overboard harrasing, attacking someone about knowledge is easily permissible
it's a win win for all parties\
loser gets educated, refines his knowledge, winner gets ego boost & dopamine, community gets discussion
it's pretty easy decision for us.
we obv aren't gonna ban people for debates on knowledge, that should be encouraged instead, it provides value & engagement.

Because of those reasons and the fear of punishments people will stop speaking their mind just like the outside world in order to avoid trouble and not cause emotional harm on others as it might have consequences when reported thus kind of removing (one of several) unique reasons to be on this forum instead of others/irl
pretty easy to avoid this brother
it's not about offending people, it's about harrasment/bullying
speak all you want on people's knowledge & theories, they aren't attached to people's identity & change
& should change, that's the whole point of looksmaxxing forum discussions.
personal attacks & bigotry need to be avoided
 

Judenbänker

Nutz die Gojim aus wie Vieh
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
565
Reputation
793
We can try to be fair, I think at some point the tradeoff of potential mod-abuse might just be worth it for the overall quality of the forum.
also, we do have debates about warning/bans pretty often
and users would get warnings not just a direct ban so they can avoid mod-abuse being undetected by being a bit careful.

dw about reports volume, pretty easy to resolve em up. we already have them people complaining about it, but easily manageable.
If this forum grows, we can just recruit more staff members.
that's not an issue.
As for the low esteem nigga being butthurt,
Mods are the ones who're going to decide
also, as long as people don't go overboard harrasing, attacking someone about knowledge is easily permissible
it's a win win for all parties\
loser gets educated, refines his knowledge, winner gets ego boost & dopamine, community gets discussion
it's pretty easy decision for us.
we obv aren't gonna ban people for debates on knowledge, that should be encouraged instead, it provides value & engagement.


pretty easy to avoid this brother
it's not about offending people, it's about harrasment/bullying
speak all you want on people's knowledge & theories, they aren't attached to people's identity & change
& should change, that's the whole point of looksmaxxing forum discussions.
personal attacks & bigotry need to be avoided
dnr

jk did read I meant more that when the people are gonna be butthurt, then they complain either theyll be given right so the other party wilm be butthurt then because they got punished or the original one will be even more cucked if they werent awarded their justice although they feel like they were in the right potentially making them dislike the forum.
About bullying, personal attacks and bigotry I think thats a big part of any realist online forum because thats just how people are (also irl, even if not as direct as online) if you cant stick up with that youre not meant to be on here in the first place and its a big appeal for people to be able to freely speak their mind without limits. I still stand with the free market shit, the forum will decide if one is just pointlessly harassing or making valid points. If youre disliked for being a bitch nothing you will do will gain any traction and you'll be driven out or give up on your own but I can see where you are coming from as well. I favor one decision but I dont hate the other, both have their pros and cons
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
Both should be allowed to post (in their respective subs), even if one is low effort and low iq then the forum just wont give positive feedback. We must let the market be free for our economy to strive, if you only post slop your ratio will get fucked up and noones gonna take you serious, slowly driving you out of the forums daily life its gonna fix itself over time.
hate speech doesn't even have 1% value addition, even on the forum that were started by SFcels, forget this one.

It's just the same 10-20 retards calling disgusting slurs & degrading stuff about each other's races

Most users who are High-Sapience either don't engage with it at all or talk about it less than 1% of the time
they can easily avoid it if they want to

While if someone's entire content is about hate speech
they are overall a net negative to the community

It's just narcissistic/sadistic miss-fits losers who ruin the community
or just some brainless sheeple who think it's "based" after watching a few tiktoks
 

Judenbänker

Nutz die Gojim aus wie Vieh
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
565
Reputation
793
Most users who are High-Sapience either don't engage with it at all or talk about it less than 1% of the time
they can easily avoid it if they want to
Which is exactly my point. Noone engages with it and they will learn that its retarded and cease. I could imagine that in individual cases maybe mods could advise users to stop chronic net negative postings similar to warnings before their removal but I think setting up a clear defined offense-punishment system is overdoing it, the issue is not that big and those people might just have to learn.
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
tbf what makes people log in online forums is the sole thing of freedom of speech
irl you cant say the stuff you want to
i get your point but the core of the forums has been the improper speech
This is actually the main reason I'm on these forums aswell
but it still works together,
The huge appeal of such sites after acquiring the looksmaxxing knowledge was that I could freely think and discuss my socially unacceptable thoughts without consequences, because people here don't require some pre-existing strong belief to join, and different thoughts are allowed. For example, if I joined a normie group, I would get immediately silenced for socially unacceptable opinions, and if I joined incles is, I couldn't really speak my mind in favor of women.

That's why org was my favorite: there, I could speak about Satan, religions, pro-equality/inequality, love/anti-love, countries, anti-Nazi/pro-Nazi views, anti/pro-eugenics, anti-women/pro-women perspectives, pro-JBmaxxing/anti-JBmaxxing, and all sorts of stuff.

The shared axioms of psychology, biology, the importance of the evidence pyramid, and scientific research, combined with a willingness to go against social norms, really made debates intelligent, fun & decisive.
And this stuff not being tied to actual identity really made me comfortable speaking my opinions out loud, as well as rage-baiting and using edgy humor for fun.
Then org went to shit with too much strictness and demands for personal details, The .com is trash because that's just normie land filled with women, so this forum became a great alternative.

I hold high hopes for this forum's potential.
It could transform into a premier space for elite discussions on psychology, drugs, surgery, steroids etc.
among a truly educated crowd that accepts genetic determinism & brutal truths. Nothing fascinates me more.

The thing is that we aren't exactly enforcing normie moral compass
debatea are allowed
If someone wants to discuss about IQ/economy/race/attractiveness etc.
They're free to do so, That would strike convos

what we don't want is, mindless wannabe non-chalant stupid narcs who just go around posting de-humanzing bigotry all day
and then bunch of retards spamming about bbc/bwc or some other cucks or disgusting people from twitter insta
as rage-bait:
"look up this cumskin/shitskin/nigger bibis brah got brutally mogged humiliated & then his girl got stolen by high t tall this that"
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
jk did read I meant more that when the people are gonna be butthurt, then they complain either theyll be given right so the other party wilm be butthurt then because they got punished or the original one will be even more cucked if they werent awarded their justice although they feel like they were in the right potentially making them dislike the forum.
people learn quick & improve their mistakes after warnings
this doesn't make people dislike the forum what so ever
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
the issue is not that big and those people might just have to learn.
they can learn after getting warnings
that what warning points are for

If I give someone 30pt warning for posting low effort offttopic stuff on looksmaxxing question

they most likely won't repeat & improve
expiration of warning & temp bans give people time to re-evaluate & improve
the ones who can't,
don't deserve to be on the forum


If someone wants to talk about mindless disgust-inducing stuff all day
they can move to another forums

our focus is on making this forum elite for looksmaxxing, self-improvement, blackpill, genes & psychology/philosophy
it's not pol4chan lol
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
that's the fucking truth an average white guy gets more pussy than an average black dude



wow bro, nobody knew that, what a great discovery
grass is green retard + you're just polluting this forum with bigotry


Judenbänker Judenbänker as you can see, the sapience level of these people.

all it can do is cause some insecure brown/black people hurt
while providing 0 value
& potentially provoking counter-response shit-talking white people with some bbc or whatever soyjack comics slop
& it keeps going on and on till these people are tired posting actual filthiest & most disgusting-inducing stuff in their gallery
\
then they go to sleep & do it again tommorow
 

Judenbänker

Nutz die Gojim aus wie Vieh
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
565
Reputation
793
Judenbänker Judenbänker Redd harlow Redd harlow

This is what I'm talking about
Low IQ people posting such stuff really serves no benefit
He got a point although the post is retarded itself yeah but 5posts 0reps hes just hurting himself wont take 600-400 rep srsly anyways jfl I see what you mean tho I cant agree with me being restricted in my freedom of speech and rare shitposts just because lowiqcels have the worst takes ever
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
He got a point although the post is retarded itself yeah4
his point is utterly garbage, yeah white skin is good but so what?
what's even the "point" here, he provided nothing of value
I don't even think anyone laughed.
he's just calling degrading names for brown/black people
& giving the young+sensitive ones of em insecurities for no reason
it's just bigotry, and adds nothing to the forum
despite some giggles (doubt it) that comes with the burden of brown/black people insecurities & de-humanization

If it were some well written thread, made just for assuring white people that they should be happy of their skin while making ethnics aware of their disadvantage, it could be fine
but he just spammed a one liner calling people disgusting & degrading names, things he learnt from some other shitty internet shorts/communities
& is too low IQ to engage in an actual argument or provide anything

I see what you mean tho I cant agree with me being restricted in my freedom of speech and rare shitposts just because lowiqcels have the worst takes ever
It'd benefit you too, for the most part
you just lose that 1% shitpost content you make while getting significantly better forum overall
I also make shit-posts once in a while,
very few of em are actually causing harm/ are hate speech

Just re-check how many of yours are harassment toward someone or just bigotry?
I bet the number would be pretty low
less than 1% of your forum activity
that goes for every semi-decent posters

just retarded zombies need hate speech shitposts
& they can fuck off back to pol
 

sjzso

Mumbaian Anus Stretching or LDAR
Joined
Oct 9, 2025
Posts
1,158
Reputation
2,654
free speech dawg no way I wont be able to tell sm1 to rope or call him a severely retaded nigger etc LOOOOL
 

Judenbänker

Nutz die Gojim aus wie Vieh
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
565
Reputation
793
his point is utterly garbage, yeah white skin is good but so what?
what's even the "point" here
The point that whites are more attractive than other races/blacks are the least attractive race.
It'd benefit you too, for the most part
you just lose that 1% shitpost content you make while getting significantly better forum overall
I also make shit-posts once in a while,
very few of em are actually causing harm/ are hate speech

Just re-check how many of yours are harassment toward someone or just bigotry?
I bet the number would be pretty low
less than 1% of your forum activity
that goes for every semi-decent posters
Having shitposts in the forum makes semidecent posts stand out more tho.

But yeah very few are just harassment could probably count them on one hand
 

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Staff member
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
821
Reputation
888
The point that whites are more attractive than other races/blacks are the least attractive race.
that's just obv, he isn't providing anything
and to some people to whom it isn't obvious, he isn't convincing em either
also, like I said
only thing he's tryna accomplish is some attention by posting offensive stuff that he heard 10000 times before
he didn't even bother thinking something & then making shit-post

these people are just cancer,
actual bots like gigacumster are better than them, literally
 
Activity
So far there's no one here

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top