[Godveil Heir]

Recently, there's been an influx of reports about people complaining of harassment.
Some edgy people are just dismissing it, but unlike other looksmaxxing forums (which were founded and popularized by SFcels on alt-right forums or other misfit, indecent individuals), this forum draws most of its members from normal social media platforms.

So we can certainly censor hate speech & still preserve almost all of the forum content while
censoring outright hate speech, like unprompted bigotry and harassment (e.g., cum tributes),
but allowing brutal ratings, lighthearted jokes in the ratings section,
and civil discussions of race-wise facial features and attractiveness differences overall.
I think it enables better content quality, minimal toxicity , broader appeal, and strong reputation among mainstream-media.

Of course, for now I just want your serious, thoughtful opinions:
What would you prefer?
a community with civil, respectful discussion or no censorship of hate speech ?
You can vote and share your perspective if it is more nuanced than a simple vote.
You can also explain the reasoning behind your vote.

NOTE: This thread is marked as serious. Please refrain from trolling or rep farming—warnings will be issued.

 

[Godveil Heir]

Circadex Mandy angelo sjzso Idec morty BastiHgH Judenbänker

 

[Redd harlow]

Circadex Mandy angelo sjzso Idec morty BastiHgH Judenbänker

bro didnt tag me

 

[VelocityAnt¹]

I don't really like how .gg is becoming rn, we sought to be different but we're becoming more and more an .orglike. Not by how we apprehend bp and lm but by how we're becoming bigoted and obnoxious to try to fight the muh tiktokcels and newgens.

 

[Redd harlow]

Recently, there's been an influx of reports about people complaining of harassment.
Some edgy people are just dismissing it, but unlike other looksmaxxing forums (which were founded and popularized by SFcels on alt-right forums or other misfit, indecent individuals), this forum draws most of its members from normal social media platforms.

So we can certainly censor hate speech & still preserve almost all of the forum content while
censoring outright hate speech, like unprompted bigotry and harassment (e.g., cum tributes),
but allowing brutal ratings, lighthearted jokes in the ratings section,
and civil discussions of race-wise facial features and attractiveness differences overall.
I think it enables better content quality, minimal toxicity , broader appeal, and strong reputation among mainstream-media.

Of course, for now I just want your serious, thoughtful opinions:
What would you prefer?
a community with civil, respectful discussion or no censorship of hate speech ?
You can vote and share your perspective if it is more nuanced than a simple vote.
You can also explain the reasoning behind your vote.

NOTE: This thread is marked as serious. Please refrain from trolling or rep farming—warnings will be issued.

time is limited only thing we have is freedom i personally still think order is the best way for humanity
not for the self tho

 

[Redd harlow]

time is limited only thing we have is freedom i personally still think order is the best way for humanity
not for the self tho

it still depends on person to person
personality of a person with lower baseline dopamine and high receptivity will be the most rebel and unauthoritative
while higher baseline and low receptivity will be the best for society

 

[Mandy]

Generally Yes,but it shouldn’t be exaggerated.

 

[Godveil Heir]

personality of a person with lower baseline dopamine and high receptivity will be the most rebel and unauthoritative

Not really. I have a really low baseline and am Giga-authoritative.
My life's goal is establishing a global authoritative regime where only the smartest, most knowledgeable perfectionists and philosophically advanced decide policies, with 0 sheeple involvement in policy-making.
But yeah, I hate senseless rules (illogical), not strictly enforced by authorities (cucked to follow) & would break them without hesitation
so maybe yeah.

anyways, we're getting off-topic
+ think & articulate properly before typing stuff

 

[Godveil Heir]

Generally Yes,but it shouldn’t be exaggerated.

elab

 

[Judenbänker]

free unrestricted speech at all costs

 

[Godveil Heir]

free unrestricted speech at all costs

reasoning?

 

[Redd harlow]

Not really. I have a really low baseline and am Giga-authoritative.
My life's goal is establishing a global authoritative regime where only the smartest, most knowledgeable perfectionists and philosophically advanced decide policies, with 0 sheeple involvement in policy-making.
But yeah, I hate senseless rules (illogical), not strictly enforced by authorities (cucked to follow) & would break them without hesitation
so maybe yeah.

anyways, we're getting off-topic
+ think & articulate properly before typing stuff

yeah thats what i mean by unauthoritative i meant hating being controlled and being the leading/dom

 

[Kaligula567]

Recently, there's been an influx of reports about people complaining of harassment.
Some edgy people are just dismissing it, but unlike other looksmaxxing forums (which were founded and popularized by SFcels on alt-right forums or other misfit, indecent individuals), this forum draws most of its members from normal social media platforms.

So we can certainly censor hate speech & still preserve almost all of the forum content while
censoring outright hate speech, like unprompted bigotry and harassment (e.g., cum tributes),
but allowing brutal ratings, lighthearted jokes in the ratings section,
and civil discussions of race-wise facial features and attractiveness differences overall.
I think it enables better content quality, minimal toxicity , broader appeal, and strong reputation among mainstream-media.

Of course, for now I just want your serious, thoughtful opinions:
What would you prefer?
a community with civil, respectful discussion or no censorship of hate speech ?
You can vote and share your perspective if it is more nuanced than a simple vote.
You can also explain the reasoning behind your vote.

NOTE: This thread is marked as serious. Please refrain from trolling or rep farming—warnings will be issued.

Yeye idk bro I don't wanna make this the new tiktok

 

[angelo]

i personally think that using derogatory language to a degree is okay, 90% of people who use the word retard, nigga, or faggot aren't using it to be an offensive asshole, but rather it's just a slang word put into their vocabulary. on the contrary, i do believe that unnecessary hate and speech against people can get out of hand and just cause problems, it'll just cause gg to turn into a cesspool of degenerates and retards who want to ruin the community we built.

 

[angelo]

tldr: if ur being a dick for no reason, ya, if ur just socialising with other people, no

 

[Godveil Heir]

tldr: if ur being a dick for no reason, ya, if ur just socialising with other people, no

no need for tldr, the more you explain the better

 

[angelo]

Circadex Mandy angelo sjzso Idec morty BastiHgH Judenbänker

i made it to the tags

 

[Redd harlow]

tldr: if ur being a dick for no reason, ya, if ur just socialising with other people, no

what if people think you are being a dick but in reality you are being factual

 

[Mandy]

I don't really like how .gg is becoming rn, we sought to be different but we're becoming more and more an .orglike. Not by how we apprehend bp and lm but by how we're becoming bigoted and obnoxious to try to fight the muh tiktokcels and newgens.

Yeah,generally I dislike to see new people asking questions about roid cycles for example but they literally have no understanding of roids in general. But I always try to give advice and help no matter how stupid they are in the general topic of maximizing themselves, after all I was one them at some point in 2023 and it’s generally sad when you try to imagine being in their position. No clue,no knowledge,no idea where to start but when you ask people insult you. Generally wrong.

 

[angelo]

no need for tldr, the more you explain the better

some people dont have enough attention span, i spoke about that in my last guide post, people dont care about talking and having genuine posts done, they just want quick no effort slop off the top of their head to get a few clicks and 3 word responses

 

[Mandy]

elab

Yes,but shouldn’t be like the censorship of .com where you can literally get banned from having a Richard Ramirez Avi.

 

[Judenbänker]

reasoning?

imo because
1. Who will evaluate what is and what isnt civil discourse (probably mods so Im gonna expect lots of modabuse / people who think there is modabuse)
2. Every low selfesteem nigger is gonna cuck himself into being the victim of insults/harassment or whatever just because his buttfucked ass cant stand others having a) different opinions on a topic b) more knowledge disproving his own or c) rated him a way he didnt want/expect which is gonna suck both for the community experience and mods who are gonna get countless reports
3. Because of those reasons and the fear of punishments people will stop speaking their mind just like the outside world in order to avoid trouble and not cause emotional harm on others as it might have consequences when reported thus kind of removing (one of several) unique reasons to be on this forum instead of others/irl

 

[Godveil Heir]

i made it to the tags

understood quick & didn't wasted my time in DMs about thread program
+ well written guides & interest in philosophy already puts you in the top 2% user-base
sincerity + willingness & interest to think put you on my good side

 

[Redd harlow]

what if people think you are being a dick but in reality you are being factual

if a person a says the n word 10 times in the title and then posts it thats just retarded
but if a person posts raical realism with studies and statistics both and just offensive to the ethnicity
but ones reality and factual and not prejudice

 

[Godveil Heir]

some people dont have enough attention span, i spoke about that in my last guide post, people dont care about talking and having genuine posts done, they just want quick no effort slop off the top of their head to get a few clicks and 3 word responses

They shouldn't be involved in policy-making if they can't read 3 lines lol