Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Face raters percentiles of faces are utterly retarded (8 Viewers)

Face raters percentiles of faces are utterly retarded
Joined
Apr 7, 2026
Posts
145
Reputation
234
  • #1
(disclaimer: ive seen multiple ratings like this, just using this example) I saw faceiq rating of Brad pitt, in which he rate brad an 8. I would give him an 8.5 but still pretty much agree with his rating, but my problem isnt the rating but what he says brads face percentile is. Faceiq said brad is the best looking out of 4 thousand people, which is just horrdesouly not true. Brad is the best out of myabe, and this is a strong maybe 400 thousand but i think its closer to like 800,000 to 1 million. Whats up with face raters and just people in the LM community making it out that attractive face are way more common then they are. its like you can go outside, walk around all day with the goal of finding just 1 htn an you proably wont, attactive faces are extremmly rare and not common at all.
 

sensitive sapphire

autosexual · archbishop of preet
Church of Preet
Joined
Nov 4, 2025
Posts
4,618
Reputation
11,286
  • #2
true true
 

zaza

Aint breathing ISIS commander
Joined
Nov 15, 2025
Posts
1,088
Reputation
1,717
  • #3
Im generous
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2025
Posts
1,747
Reputation
5,636
  • #4
fr brah relatable
walking out in public is starting to feel like a red carpet event I never signed up for Every single time I step outside the entire crowd just stops and stares like they've never seen someone with actual aura before I don't mean to completely disrupt everyone's day just by existing but apparently my effortless looks is a major public distraction

1 out 1 btw
 

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #5
(disclaimer: ive seen multiple ratings like this, just using this example) I saw faceiq rating of Brad pitt, in which he rate brad an 8. I would give him an 8.5 but still pretty much agree with his rating, but my problem isnt the rating but what he says brads face percentile is. Faceiq said brad is the best looking out of 4 thousand people, which is just horrdesouly not true. Brad is the best out of myabe, and this is a strong maybe 400 thousand but i think its closer to like 800,000 to 1 million. Whats up with face raters and just people in the LM community making it out that attractive face are way more common then they are. its like you can go outside, walk around all day with the goal of finding just 1 htn an you proably wont, attactive faces are extremmly rare and not common at all.
It assumes 5 is the average. Which is very much not true. Considering let's say tom holland is a 5.5 and you don't see guys like him walking down the streets. Most guys I see are 4 at best. Since the only way to sort an average in a country or state or etc is the calculate about thousands. Ain't no motherfucker doing that even if he was chronically unemployed. So they just put the value of 5 as the average. And faceiq is retarded anyway
 

nikolozzz

Love you all
Joined
May 19, 2026
Posts
531
Reputation
1,368
  • #6
(disclaimer: ive seen multiple ratings like this, just using this example) I saw faceiq rating of Brad pitt, in which he rate brad an 8. I would give him an 8.5 but still pretty much agree with his rating, but my problem isnt the rating but what he says brads face percentile is. Faceiq said brad is the best looking out of 4 thousand people, which is just horrdesouly not true. Brad is the best out of myabe, and this is a strong maybe 400 thousand but i think its closer to like 800,000 to 1 million. Whats up with face raters and just people in the LM community making it out that attractive face are way more common then they are. its like you can go outside, walk around all day with the goal of finding just 1 htn an you proably wont, attactive faces are extremmly rare and not common at all.
Faceiq lab is worst shit ever nigger, innacurate, higher or lower in almost every pillar, don't trust that fuckass app.
 

the wizard

farley mowat disciple,
PSL
Joined
Apr 1, 2026
Posts
2,517
Reputation
4,265
  • #7
(disclaimer: ive seen multiple ratings like this, just using this example) I saw faceiq rating of Brad pitt, in which he rate brad an 8. I would give him an 8.5 but still pretty much agree with his rating, but my problem isnt the rating but what he says brads face percentile is. Faceiq said brad is the best looking out of 4 thousand people, which is just horrdesouly not true. Brad is the best out of myabe, and this is a strong maybe 400 thousand but i think its closer to like 800,000 to 1 million. Whats up with face raters and just people in the LM community making it out that attractive face are way more common then they are. its like you can go outside, walk around all day with the goal of finding just 1 htn an you proably wont, attactive faces are extremmly rare and not common at all.
water we knew this, but it’s good u said it
 

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #8
Faceiq lab is worst shit ever nigger, innacurate, higher or lower in almost every pillar, don't trust that fuckass app.
"Gandy is too forward grown" when that nigga is slightly recessed
 

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #9

nikolozzz

Love you all
Joined
May 19, 2026
Posts
531
Reputation
1,368
  • #10
"Gandy is too forward grown" when that nigga is slightly recessed
Too forward growth isn't even a term, what he said is called mandibular prognathism, which Gandy does NOT have.
 

nikolozzz

Love you all
Joined
May 19, 2026
Posts
531
Reputation
1,368
  • #11
I mean tbf the landmarkings are manual.
Even if you place landmarkings perfectly he uses bad formula, outdated or just wrong, thats why his analysis are wrong
 

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #12
Even if you place landmarkings perfectly he uses bad formula, outdated or just wrong, thats why his analysis are wrong
Yes his formula is stupid. I agree
 

nikolozzz

Love you all
Joined
May 19, 2026
Posts
531
Reputation
1,368
  • #13

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #14

nikolozzz

Love you all
Joined
May 19, 2026
Posts
531
Reputation
1,368
  • #15

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #16

nikolozzz

Love you all
Joined
May 19, 2026
Posts
531
Reputation
1,368
  • #17

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #18
Too forward growth isn't even a term, what he said is called mandibular prognathism, which Gandy does NOT have.
Bimaxillary protrusion actually. Even then gandy doesn't even align with any of the visual cues such as protruded lips. Not to mention the mf literally had a 3/4 and used it as side
 

Harpy

Short Penied Individual (SPI)
Joined
Mar 15, 2026
Posts
179
Reputation
245
  • #19
Joined
Apr 7, 2026
Posts
145
Reputation
234
  • #20
Joined
Apr 7, 2026
Posts
145
Reputation
234
  • #21
Faceiq lab is worst shit ever nigger, innacurate, higher or lower in almost every pillar, don't trust that fuckass app.
Bro It literally gave faceiq himself a higher score then jordan barrett and jeremy meeks, it dosent work for shit
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top