Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Disproving Medslayer’s anti–bonesmashing claims: WARNING – Medslayer used a dangerously selective amount of cherry-picked studies (29 Viewers)

Disproving Medslayer’s anti–bonesmashing claims: WARNING – Medslayer used a dangerously selective amount of cherry-picked studies

gandeism

Join my bone-smashing dynasty.
Joined
Mar 30, 2026
Posts
266
Reputation
223
Hello fellow looksmaxers I will do a quick introduction.
So, the user who goes by MedSlayer MedSlayer first interacted with my bonesmashing thread:
https://looksmax.gg/threads/mechanisms-behind-bonesmashing-proving-its-validity-not-water.26114/
And started making invalid counterarguments, which I have disproved here:
https://looksmax.gg/threads/exposing-medslayer-medfaggot.26137/
Now, he has made his own thread in which he tried debunking my claims.
Let's begin!


Snimka zaslona 2026-04-01 125040.png


Here he didn't try disproving my claim but instead actually helped my case.

In order for osteoblast and osteocyte activity to be induced by bonesmashing there first must act mechanotransduction in osteocytes which will increase the activity of the ion transporter Connexin-43 who helps signal ca2 which will result in a ca2 influx. The ca2 influx activates pathways such as prostaglandins, Wnt/β-catenin, growth factors etc. This directly results in the mitosis of osteocytes and osteoblasts. (from now on we are calling this "the process"


Snimka zaslona 2026-04-01 130538.png


(same study he mentioned)

He mentions the process is only activated by Dynamic intermittent loading which is false, mechanosensation is the main driver of mechanotransduction and it acts upon the movement of cytoplasms inside the cells, the cell cytoplasm will move no matter what type of stress is applied.
NEEEXT CLAIMMMM!!!!!

Snimka zaslona 2026-04-01 131141.png


Snimka zaslona 2026-04-01 131415.png

YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP BAHAHHAHA

This is how the study starts… I’ll start off by saying the obvious: we are not sheep, except you, MedNigger
His next 2 points are about sheep so invalid...
(If you have reasons to believe im avoiding his arguments make sure to tag me down in replies and ill answer it as if it were done on humans)
Snimka zaslona 2026-04-01 133424.png


These are all the other arguments he made in this thread, i used one picture so i can fit more in here



"While bonesmashing these pathways cannot be stimulated
because it's too localized and high magnitude which instead of causing strain across the bone matrix simply cause micro-fractures because it doesn't have the time to deform itself and spread the energy across the bone."

This is the complete opposite of what actually happens, osteocytes sense localized fluid shear stress in the lacuna–canalicular network which then goes thru "The process"
Also saying "It's high magnitude" is an anecdote so its very much invalid


"It's because humans bones can only deform to about 0.7%-0.85% of strain thus making it brittle"

Snimka zaslona 2026-04-01 134131.png


This is pure retard slop, im genuinely angry at this

facial bones are mostly flat bones, formed through intramembranous ossification rather than endochondral ossification (process that forms trabecular bone)
You absolute retard, lying to the face of your followers how dare you.
Don't show your face in bonesmashing arguments ever again you moron, shame on you for being a liar.

His next claim is that micro fractured bone are extremely fragile which is just not true at all, once the bone osifys the broken micro fragment and the bone matures it will be as good as new

Also i explained that HO is not of concern since "the process" acts upon the subperiostal part of the bone


Tabula Rasa Tabula Rasa EqBeliever EqBeliever Hexum Hexum

Again shame on you for lying




 

MedSlayer

Former Subhuman
Joined
Mar 7, 2026
Posts
806
Reputation
1,785
Hello fellow looksmaxers I will do a quick introduction.
So, the user who goes by MedSlayer MedSlayer first interacted with my bonesmashing thread:
https://looksmax.gg/threads/mechanisms-behind-bonesmashing-proving-its-validity-not-water.26114/
And started making invalid counterarguments, which I have disproved here:
https://looksmax.gg/threads/exposing-medslayer-medfaggot.26137/
Now, he has made his own thread in which he tried debunking my claims.
Let's begin!


View attachment 41416

Here he didn't try disproving my claim but instead actually helped my case.

In order for osteoblast and osteocyte activity to be induced by bonesmashing there first must act mechanotransduction in osteocytes which will increase the activity of the ion transporter Connexin-43 who helps signal ca2 which will result in a ca2 influx. The ca2 influx activates pathways such as prostaglandins, Wnt/β-catenin, growth factors etc. This directly results in the mitosis of osteocytes and osteoblasts. (from now on we are calling this "the process"


View attachment 41418

(same study he mentioned)

He mentions the process is only activated by Dynamic intermittent loading which is false, mechanosensation is the main driver of mechanotransduction and it acts upon the movement of cytoplasms inside the cells, the cell cytoplasm will move no matter what type of stress is applied.
NEEEXT CLAIMMMM!!!!!

View attachment 41420

View attachment 41421

YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP BAHAHHAHA

This is how the study starts… I’ll start off by saying the obvious: we are not sheep, except you, MedNigger
His next 2 points are about sheep so invalid...
(If you have reasons to believe im avoiding his arguments make sure to tag me down in replies and ill answer it as if it were done on humans)
View attachment 41438

These are all the other arguments he made in this thread, i used one picture so i can fit more in here



"While bonesmashing these pathways cannot be stimulated
because it's too localized and high magnitude which instead of causing strain across the bone matrix simply cause micro-fractures because it doesn't have the time to deform itself and spread the energy across the bone."

This is the complete opposite of what actually happens, osteocytes sense localized fluid shear stress in the lacuna–canalicular network which then goes thru "The process"
Also saying "It's high magnitude" is an anecdote so its very much invalid


"It's because humans bones can only deform to about 0.7%-0.85% of strain thus making it brittle"

View attachment 41440

This is pure retard slop, im genuinely angry at this

facial bones are mostly flat bones, formed through intramembranous ossification rather than endochondral ossification (process that forms trabecular bone)
You absolute retard, lying to the face of your followers how dare you.
Don't show your face in bonesmashing arguments ever again you moron, shame on you for being a liar.

His next claim is that micro fractured bone are extremely fragile which is just not true at all, once the bone osifys the broken micro fragment and the bone matures it will be as good as new

Also i explained that HO is not of concern since "the process" acts upon the subperiostal part of the bone


Tabula Rasa Tabula Rasa EqBeliever EqBeliever Hexum Hexum

Again shame on you for lying




This nigga is so fckin retarded
 

gandeism

Join my bone-smashing dynasty.
Joined
Mar 30, 2026
Posts
266
Reputation
223
we know that's ur alt bro

I'm done replying to ur retarded threads
If that was truly my alt that would mean i knew everything tabula speaks about which would indicate im on the same iq level as him, dont dissrespect my king like that. Tabula i swear he didnt mean it
 

gandeism

Join my bone-smashing dynasty.
Joined
Mar 30, 2026
Posts
266
Reputation
223
if It was a debate you would've taken it to pms

youre just seeking validation by making a thread dedicated to the situation
No it must be made public for further research, user can try to challange my claims, they can agree, they can make counterarguments, they can learn unlike in pms
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top