atrophicpyra
Ranked 1 gg retard
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2026
- Posts
- 1,657
- Reputation
- 1,329
your right but in that aspect all ants u killed had moral attitude towards life and just wanted to survive YOU killed themWe should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?
we should all die
TD

