Death sentence for murders (56 Viewers)

[Circadex]

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?

 

[medialcathus]

nope well said

 

[SinisterTRADition]

Goatis spoke of this

 

[Circadex]

Goatis spoke of this

Goatis is a retard don't say his name under my threads

 

[SinisterTRADition]

Goatis is a retard don't say his name under my threads

Goatis

 

[12455]

 

[Hyporoxin]

 

[Razi]

2 circa threads today I must be dreaming

 

[trvecel]

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?

Govs think muh overpopulating jail cells instead of death sentence is ethical n sheit

 

[Daniel Larpson]

Lowk bro letting them rot in a cell is better because im sure 100% of ppl with life sentence would rather die then spend life in jail

 

[Circadex]

Didn't think this would be so well-received, it's definitely one of my more "dangerous" takes that's (if implemented) open to numerous malicious exploits, thought over it a little but it's very nuanced and difficult to perfect realistically

 

[El ︎]

i agree, however it’s extremely circumstantial but for the most part yes


goatis

 

[El ︎]

Didn't think this would be so well-received, it's definitely one of my more "dangerous" takes that's (if implemented) open to numerous malicious exploits, thought over it a little but it's very nuanced and difficult to perfect realistically

i can definitely see it being used by people to legally get someone killed though, a whole group could make false reports and it’s very dangerous

 

[Aylan]

Yes

 

[Circadex]

Lowk bro letting them rot in a cell is better because im sure 100% of ppl with life sentence would rather die then spend life in jail

Don't care what's more punishing, getting rid of them is far better

Govs think muh overpopulating jail cells instead of death sentence is ethical n sheit

True. Though currently the death sentence is unhealthy, idiot politicians wouldn't implement it properly

i can definitely see it being used by people to legally get someone killed though, a whole group could make false reports and it’s very dangerous

Yes i was eluding to that. It's highly possible it'd be abused to murder certain ethnicities due to ones personal agenda

 

[trvecel]

Lowk bro letting them rot in a cell is better because im sure 100% of ppl with life sentence would rather die then spend life in jail

I mean sure but jail overpopulation is becoming a big issue, stop arresting people for stupid shit and kill the niggas who deserve it

 

[Circadex]

I mean sure but jail overpopulation is becoming a big issue, stop arresting people for stupid shit and kill the niggas who deserve it

Could've said it better myself. Do agree, though

 

[Daniel Larpson]

I mean sure but jail overpopulation is becoming a big issue, stop arresting people for stupid shit and kill the niggas who deserve it

Jail vs prison is different tho and Yes I agree with jail is overpopulated

 

[Aylan]

But i have a question for u circa

What about someone raping someone who raped his daughter before the invention of ur Law

 

[Daniel Larpson]

But i have a question for u circa

What about someone raping someone who raped his daughter before the invention of ur Law

2 wrongs dont make a right son

 

[Hyporoxin]

Their bodies could also be used for organ donation

 

[Aylan]

Their bodies could also be used for organ donation

And for sexdoll crafting

 

[Aylan]

2 wrongs dont make a right son

2 poops dont make Diarrhea

 

[Circadex]

But i have a question for u circa

What about someone raping someone who raped his daughter before the invention of ur Law

2 wrongs dont make a right son

Fucking incels and rape, it's obsessive

 

[Aylan]

Fucking incels and rape, it's obsessive

Yh i agree

 

[XvideosDemon]

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?

(This is just 1 person we need to get rid of and people need to stop praising a mass killer) Get rid of nba yb asap that mf is a rapper richer than most of the population and has killed a shit ton of niggas and does retarded shit not one thing brought too the table of society.

I agree with this.

 

[Circadex]

Yh i agree

Ah wait you're the JBG pilled guy, guess you're just a degenerate/ex-incel then. Your boyfriend being a pseudo-nazi makes this ever-so apparent

 

[Aylan]

@Circadex what If a great scientist kill someone ? Would u kill him

 

[Aylan]

Ah wait you're the JBG pilled guy, guess you're just a degenerate/ex-incel then. Your boyfriend being a pseudo-nazi makes this ever-so apparent

Nah bro im just messing with u

 

[12455]

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?

Society should mandate clinical trials or high risk clinical experimentation for homeless fucks and criminals as their negligible GDP contribution justifies leveraging them to optimize economic efficiency and medical advancement

 

[trvecel]

Jail vs prison is different tho

Jail = few years for some petty shit or awaiting trial

Prison = the shit u do a long amount of time in

 

[Aylan]

@XvideosDemon hey

 

[Circadex]

@Circadex what If a great scientist kill someone ? Would u kill him

The thread wasn't "Who I'd kill", it's a large-scale criminal processing concept, i really don't care for individuals. Also i specified "violent", not just any murder. There's acceptable instances of murder

Society should mandate clinical trials or high risk clinical experimentation for homeless fucks and criminals as their negligible GDP contribution justifies leveraging them to optimize economic efficiency and medical advancement

Random homeless people is just barbaric but sure those who are violent

 

[XvideosDemon]

@XvideosDemon hey

Wsg bhai Hyb ?

 

[Circadex]

Jail = few years for some petty shit or awaiting trial

Prison = the shit u do a long amount of time in

This is the one thing I'm not a stickler on, it practically means the same thing to everyone so why bother

 

[Aylan]

The thread wasn't "Who I'd kill", it's a large-scale criminal processing concept, i really don't care for individuals. Also i specified "violent", not just any murder. There's acceptable instances of murder


Random homeless people is just barbaric but sure those who are violent

Mmmh some violent homeless ppl are just broken vétérans sometimes. We should do some program to help them

 

[Circadex]

Mmmh some violent homeless ppl are just broken vétérans sometimes. We should do some program to help them

Yes social rehabilitation is something i strongly believe in, i really should've specified the order of events in my "perfect world"

 

[nikolozzz]

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?

Nietzsche spoke of this

 

[Aylan]

Nietzsche spoke of this

Circa did before him

 

[XvideosDemon]

Circa did before him

Who did ?

 

[sensitive sapphire]

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists. What do they bring to the table? Nothing. If we'd kill them, then sell all their personal possessions to fund more executions, and increase prison-processing capacity with the aforementioned funding, we'd be one-step closer to a functional society. "B-b-but w-what about the innocents!!" wrongful imprisonment & executions can be mostly avoided by rigorously processing the individuals to ensure they're not wrongfully killed under a false pretense. The majority of such cases currently stem from the DOJ's poor handling and corruption, which'd be prevented by a new system. Also, since these people are true subhumans, we can test drugs on them with zero repercussions, does anyone actually care if a convicted child molester dies from profuse anal bleeding because Johnson & Johnson tested an experimental drug on them? No, of-course not. To combat human rights activists throwing a tantrum, anti-criminal propaganda would be shoved down the throats of the public throughout their lives to ensure positive opinions. Rapid pharmaceutical advancement would be imminent once companies can legally test experimental drugs & skip safety procedures, and there'd be less idiots burdening society (Violent offenders tend to have an IQ roughly 8-10 points lower than the average person). Prison guards would also have much more dictation over these "people" to prevent confrontational encounters, and security would be enhanced. Any oppose this idea?

i agree with killing the rapists, childpredators and terrorists but not all murderers, some things are more important than right or wrong like revenge, love, etc

 

[Aylan]

For example a husband killing his wife cuz she is gonna take half After divorce not very fair to kill him

(Same for a women if she earns more)

 

[Circadex]

i agree with killing the rapists, childpredators and terrorists but not all murderers, some things are more important than right or wrong like revenge, love, etc

It's literally the first sentence

We should just kill violent murders, rapists, child-predators and terrorists.

 

[XvideosDemon]

For example a husband killing his wife cuz she is gonna take half After divorce not very fair to kill him

(Same for a women if she earns more)

True

Or if George Floyd stops breathing because of beating pregnant women. Not fair to the pregnant women .

@Syna

 

[sensitive sapphire]

It's literally the first sentence

mb bro i just woke up i didnt see that

 

[XvideosDemon]

mb bro i just woke up i didnt see that

Yg bro

 

[Circadex]

mb bro i just woke up i didnt see that

It's an insult to not prepare yourself when reading my threads. I expect people to print out the pages, pour themselves their favourite wine, dim the lights & put on their reading glasses before indulging in my perfection

 

[XvideosDemon]

It's an insult to not prepare yourself when reading my threads. I expect people to print out the pages, pour themselves their favourite wine, dim the lights & put on their reading glasses before indulging in my perfection

Alr this was funny

 

[Syna]

Were we supposed to disagree? lol

 

[Circadex]

Were we supposed to disagree? lol

No, it's just a controversial take, didn't expect so many to agree. Plus there's zero insight with people just virtue-signalling, I'd rather the occasional opposition so i can learn/reshape my views