hellokitty
Iron
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2025
- Posts
- 1,158
- Reputation
- 1,147
Criminals, when measured in large statistical samples, are essentially a reduction to earlier stages of human development. While individuals can be anything, collectively they are typically evolutionary degenerates with archaic skulls. This is why many prominent figures in degenerate ideologies such as liberalism, Nazism, and communism are essentially freaks and degenerates. The leadership of the Third Reich and the USSR literally banned this cranial classification because most of their leaders fell into the criminal and degenerate categories. For example, Maximilien Robespierre (French Revolution, liberalism. He possessed an extremely degenerate skull), Goebbels (a degenerate skull. A communist who later became a Nazi), Hitler (also a degenerate), Lenin/Stalin, and others—all of them gravitated toward more egalitarian, simple, horizontal ideologies, because their brains are structured in such a way that degenerate criminals possess a more archaic mindset, as a result of which they favor social models more similar to the primitive societies of ancient peoples. Democracy, Nazism, communism, liberalism, anarchism, and so on attract genetic degenerates. All of them dislike hereditary hierarchy, or, for example, private property, because the stage of evolutionary development to which they are a reduction was not yet sufficiently progressive for such phenomena. But there is a flip side: not all political criminals are such degenerates. Napoleon and Alexander the Great possessed extremely evolutionarily advanced, neotenic, and regular skulls and facial features. These people are criminals not because they are simply too archaic to fit into modern human society (like Robespierre or Hitler), but rather because they represent a higher stage of evolution for which modern human society is not yet ready.
