teekhimithai
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2026
- Posts
- 89
- Reputation
- 68
I always KNEW U WERE A MAYO OH WAIT UR BIO IS FUCKING JEWISH JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEWlearn how to spell jeet*
I always KNEW U WERE A MAYO OH WAIT UR BIO IS FUCKING JEWISH JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEWlearn how to spell jeet*
You chose wronge guy niggaCanabal ahh nga

. Even tho India and Pakistan are separate nations today, nationality is not the same as ethnicity and i hope you know and realise that. The border between the two countries was only established in 1947, meaning that the populations on both sides share thousands of years of common history and ancestry.
.


did you know the number zero was discovered when trying to calculate how many goyim deserve to liveI always KNEW U WERE A MAYO OH WAIT UR BIO IS FUCKING JEWISH JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW
You chose wronge guy nigga. Even tho India and Pakistan are separate nations today, nationality is not the same as ethnicity and i hope you know and realise that. The border between the two countries was only established in 1947, meaning that the populations on both sides share thousands of years of common history and ancestry.
Genetic studies always place Pakistani and Indian populations within the same broader S. Asian genetic cluster. One of the clearest pieces of evidence comes from FST genetic distance data. fst measures how genetically different populations are from one another, lower numbers indicate greater similarity. The genetic distance between Pakistanis and W. Indians (gujaratis) is only 0.008, while the distance between Pakistanis and North Indians is 0.010. These numbers are extremely low and indicate a close genetic relationship btw.
Furthermore, Pakistanis are genetically much closer to Indian populations than to populations from other parts of the world. For example, the genetic distance between Pakistanis and E. Asians is 0.076 and between Pakistanis and subb Sharan Africans it is 0.129. If Pakistanis and Indians were truly unrelated ethnic groups, we would expect much larger genetic distances between them. Instead, the data shows the opposite for some reason.
Here are couple of studies and proofs for you retard, i also added the fst graph so you can see it yourself. Now show me your arguments paki, or should I say IndianView attachment 53057View attachment 53058View attachment 53055
Dnr jeetView attachment 53059
You chose wronge guy nigga. Even tho India and Pakistan are separate nations today, nationality is not the same as ethnicity and i hope you know and realise that. The border between the two countries was only established in 1947, meaning that the populations on both sides share thousands of years of common history and ancestry.
Genetic studies always place Pakistani and Indian populations within the same broader S. Asian genetic cluster. One of the clearest pieces of evidence comes from FST genetic distance data. fst measures how genetically different populations are from one another, lower numbers indicate greater similarity. The genetic distance between Pakistanis and W. Indians (gujaratis) is only 0.008, while the distance between Pakistanis and North Indians is 0.010. These numbers are extremely low and indicate a close genetic relationship btw.
Furthermore, Pakistanis are genetically much closer to Indian populations than to populations from other parts of the world. For example, the genetic distance between Pakistanis and E. Asians is 0.076 and between Pakistanis and subb Sharan Africans it is 0.129. If Pakistanis and Indians were truly unrelated ethnic groups, we would expect much larger genetic distances between them. Instead, the data shows the opposite for some reason.
Here are couple of studies and proofs for you retard, i also added the fst graph so you can see it yourself. Now show me your arguments paki, or should I say IndianView attachment 53057View attachment 53058View attachment 53055
Dnr jeetView attachment 53059
Are u trying to teach me ABOUT my own country I will probably reply to this in a day or toNo argument jeet jfl![]()
No argument jeet jfl
Yes I am cause youre iqlet and I am the one who did research, give up nigga you lostAre u trying to teach me ABOUT my own country I will probably reply to this in a day or to


I didn't loose in anything. I will debunk this later have patienceNo argument jeet jfl
Yes I am cause youre iqlet and I am the one who did research, give up nigga you lost![]()
just be patientI didn't loose in anything. I will debunk this later have patience
mirin this threadRacism is low IQ behavior. It’s judging every person by just one trait their race and stopping there. High IQ people look at the individual, not the label.
Low IQ people see a race and shut off their brain. Most racists think they’re smart truth tellers, but they’re just lazy. They make conclusions without thinking or getting real info.
You can’t call yourself smart if you judge people before you even know them. Judge the person, not the race.
All Stereotypes exist for a reasonRacism is low IQ behavior. It’s judging every person by just one trait their race and stopping there. High IQ people look at the individual, not the label.
Low IQ people see a race and shut off their brain. Most racists think they’re smart truth tellers, but they’re just lazy. They make conclusions without thinking or getting real info.
You can’t call yourself smart if you judge people before you even know them. Judge the person, not the race.


