Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

are there any bad effects to smoking if i just do it sometimes (1 Viewer)

are there any bad effects to smoking if i just do it sometimes

foidfucker

stressed
Joined
Mar 6, 2026
Posts
12
Reputation
7
i’m talking 1 cigarette every other month

nothing really serious, but i’m still scared of bad effects


cigarettes look tough too so i lowkey want to smoke sum sometimes
 

Circadex

The real "child of renaissance"
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
8,144
Reputation
13,864
If someone gets addicted to smoking
They deserve to die ngl
definition of genetic trash

it's barely pleasurable
nicotine is the go-to example of addictive substance wdym?
70% of people who smoke once become daily smokers. It's very relaxing substance early on, but then obviously becomes just habbit later on when the receptors are raped

that's also with the fact tobacco tastes like utter dog shit. Vaping is a better example of this engineered addictive bs, needs to be banned outright
 

foidfucker

stressed
Joined
Mar 6, 2026
Posts
12
Reputation
7
once, my brother smoked a cigarette and guess what, he got in a car crash the next day
IMG_3523.gif
 

Circadex

The real "child of renaissance"
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
8,144
Reputation
13,864
first of all a cigarette doesn't even has that much nicotine
Relative to vapes sure, but you'll get a "buzz" regardless

2ndly, it's not

there's a reason it's not a controlled substance
I didn't say the most addictive, just the most common example of addiction

and it's not controlled because it's just cultural & makes a shit ton of money

same with alcohol. These things wouldn't be approved in modern society given they were new
 

Godveil Heir

Head Moderator
Staff member
The Grove
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
4,540
Reputation
9,139
Relative to vapes sure, but you'll get a "buzz" regardless
didn't even feel anything whenever I smoked
I didn't say the most addictive, just the most common example of addiction
just that the subhumans get addicted to anything
It's not controlled that's why it's a "common addiction" monkeys just can't access darknet so it's hard for them to get their hands on meth etc.
and it's not controlled because it's just cultural & makes a shit ton of money
no, it's because it's dogshit and barely addictive
same with alcohol. These things wouldn't be approved in morden society given they were new
no, it's because it's dogshit and barely addictive
 

Circadex

The real "child of renaissance"
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
8,144
Reputation
13,864
didn't even feel anything whenever I smoked
that's just anecdotetal, though. You may have just had a shit cigarette and/or you're not prone to the addictive nature


just that the subhumans get addicted to anything
True

It's not controlled that's why it's a "common addiction" monkeys just can't access darknet so it's hard for them to get their hands on meth etc.
Ofc

it's many cultural & monetary factors as to why it's still able to buy in most countries. But it's still an instant-hit addictive substance that you're guaranteed to be exposed to in your lifetime. If meth was sold in stores & showed to be a normal day-to-day substance in all media, it'd be consumed just like nicotine is

no, it's because it's dogshit and barely addictive

no, it's because it's dogshit and barely addictive
Wdym? They're both renowned carongens with substantial data proving they're addictive, dangerous, and a net-negative to society in general. They're highly addictive to those with predisposed addiction factors, and those with subpar lives in general

Alcohol specifically just amplifies people's unchecked emotions aswell
oash-alcohol-cancer-fig6.jpg

https://www.breastcancer.org/news/alcohol-breast-cancer-risk-surgeon-general-advisory

there's just no chance shit like this would ever get FDA approved as a new recreational substance
 

Godveil Heir

Head Moderator
Staff member
The Grove
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
4,540
Reputation
9,139
it's many cultural & monetary factors as to why it's still able to buy in most countries. But it's still an instant-hit addictive substance that you're guaranteed to be exposed to in your lifetime. If meth was sold in stores & showed to be a normal day-to-day substance in all media, it'd be consumed just like nicotine is
Meth and other actual drugs gives you 100x more dopamine than that
and it also has many mechanism which severely impair the decision making after withdrawal
nicotine and alcohol aren't comparable

Wdym? They're both renowned carongens with substantial data proving they're addictive, dangerous, and a net-negative to society in general. They're highly addictive to those with predisposed addiction factors, and those with subpar lives in general

Alcohol specifically just amplifies people's unchecked emotions aswell
View attachment 39610
https://www.breastcancer.org/news/alcohol-breast-cancer-risk-surgeon-general-advisory
there's just no chance shit like this would ever get FDA approved as a new recreational substance
This is just some random article
it's based on nothing
 

Circadex

The real "child of renaissance"
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
8,144
Reputation
13,864
Meth and other actual drugs gives you 100x more dopamine than that
and it also has many mechanism which severely impair the decision making after withdrawal
nicotine and alcohol aren't comparable
I'm not denying this

This is just some random article
it's based on nothing
How? It's Surgeon General

Author would have to be beyond retarded to misinterpret the abstract
here's the link tho https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-020-01101-2

it's a 226,162 participant study you can't really shrug it off
 

Godveil Heir

Head Moderator
Staff member
The Grove
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
4,540
Reputation
9,139
How? It's Surgeon General
Author would have to be beyond retarded to misinterpret the abstract
just virtue signaling and slaving is enough
here's the link tho https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-020-01101-2
it's a 226,162 participant study you can't really shrug it off
(P interaction = 0.049) aka ~4.9%.
it's barely significant
genes are what really matter
and then author just pulls up some random number out of his ass for muh this drink per day = this % chance

and this was besides the original point of cancer
it's literally people who drink too much daily, getting a barely significant increased chance of cancer
 

Circadex

The real "child of renaissance"
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Posts
8,144
Reputation
13,864
(P interaction = 0.049) aka ~4.9%.
it's barely significant
genes are what really matter
and then author just pulls up some random number out of his ass for muh this drink per day = this % chance
and this was besides the original point of cancer
it's literally people who drink too much daily, getting a barely significant increased chance of cancer
that's just breast cancer though, the
absolute risk for all types was 4.4-5.4% for m/f. That's still a significant difference on national scale, especially for countries with tax-payed health care

that's 16,850,000 people for the USA. Millions of preventable cases

why would this get approved today? Just a easily preventable burden on medical & LE resources


Not always
70% of people
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2026
Posts
636
Reputation
656
that's just breast cancer though, the
absolute risk for all types was 4.4-5.4% for m/f. That's still a significant difference on national scale, especially for countries with tax-payed health care

that's 16,850,000 people for the USA. Millions of preventable cases

why would this get approved today? Just a easily preventable burden on medical & LE resources



70% of people
Im part of the 30% then ig
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top