Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Discussion are the negroes even human?

Godveil Heir

Perfectionist
Joined
Dec 11, 2025
Posts
1,627
Reputation
2,437
im infamous on lookist forums, lol
Node's Bitch?
that account is also banned from what I recall

and old picture of got daimn written won't do
you could've planned it before

@/data/avatars/s/28/28216.jpg?1768492012 J350 You have 5 minutes
A video of you handwriting "J350 on .gg" on paper and your arm exposed, or simply saying it out loud with your face visible .

or ban
these 2
or foid
 

J350

Modernity negates meaning.
Joined
Dec 3, 2025
Posts
60
Reputation
66
Node's Bitch?
that account is also banned from what I recall

and old picture of got daimn written won't do
you could've planned it before


these 2
or foid
You might be the dumbest user I have had the displeasure of encountering

IMG_4069.jpeg
 

oldfag

ugly retard effortposting in 14yo hell
Joined
Jan 7, 2026
Posts
159
Reputation
201
if you want to be taken seriously don't refer to them as negroes and instead use SSA. i think you know this.
i will say despite the shit you're getting, sepehr makes a very convincing argument regarding this topic.

i don't know why you would use SSAs as the primary example for subspecies/species differentiation, though. again, i think you know this and just want to be provocative. the best example you could give would be australian aboriginals.
skullrender.jpg
oldskullrender.jpg
GiJBxdzWAAAFdh1.jpg
aYDAAPrg_700w_0.jpg
abo vs eur.jpg
6a00d83451dfb969e20112790b003128a4.jpg
GiIy6Y0XAAAERYx.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2026
Posts
64
Reputation
44
I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?

fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.

by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.

references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.
Niggers are not human⚡⚡🙋👌white power
 
Activity
So far there's no one here

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top