J350
Modernity negates meaning.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2025
- Posts
- 60
- Reputation
- 66
I cannot help but ask myself the extent to which they (negroids and Caucasoids) truly constitute a part of the same species. genetic analyses have discerned a striking degree of endogamy within both racial groups, with allelic diversity exceeding that observed amongst certain avian, reptilian, and piscean taxonomies [1]. this genetic isolation, archaic hominid ancestry, begs the question: are we still warranted in appending the moniker 'homo sapiens' to all of humanity with such disparate lineage?
fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.
by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.
references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.
fuerle's work [2][3], imbued with a rigorously scientific methodology and an unflinching commitment to the truth, forces us to confront the possibility that the negro may represent a distinct, albeit closely related, species. the notion, once taboo, of affording the negro a unique taxonomic designation, emerges as a plausible hypothesis that merits further scholarly scrutiny.
by examining the negro through the lens of modern genetics, anatomy, and evolutionary theory, we find ourselves compelled to revisit the very definition of our species. the persistence of racial disparities, rooted in our deep evolutionary past, challenges us to reevaluate the boundaries of what it means to be human.
references
[1] Shriver MD, Kennedy GC, Parra EJ, Lawson HA, Sonpar V, Huang J, Akey JM, Jones KW. The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs. Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):274-86. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274. PMID: 15588487; PMCID: PMC3525267.
[2] Fuerle, R. D. (2008). Erectus walks amongst us: The evolution of modern humans. Spooner Press. ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8.
[3]Hu, Meng. 2025. “Erectus Walks Amongst Us: A Book Arguing That Africans Are a Different Species…” July 13, 2025.

