hello
since this forum hold to clavianism the which is a pure bp based looksmaxxing philosophy following the first master of clavianism who is of course clavicular himself but as a clavian based forum we need to develp arguments for refuting androgenicism and proving that the clavian way is that true looksmaxxing philosophy sand this is point of the whole thread im uneducated on androgenicism but for those who studied his way and hold to clavian philosophy pls give your arguments
razi.
