- Joined
- Dec 11, 2025
- Posts
- 1,762
- Reputation
- 2,744
I'm just gonna straight up delete retarded posts and ban/warn the retards
There is no point in arguing with people who don't even understand the hierarchy of evidence.
subhuman creatures who dismiss randomized controlled trials and proper measurements with a Google search, vague AI outputs, “muh some doctor said so,” or anecdotes from a friend. or they try to recall selective, biased info from their subhuman faulty memory, mixing up timelines and details, and ofcourse! they can't recognize cognitive biases.
"mUh FrEE sPeEcH mUSt bE dIsCuSsEd—oR eLsE wHo DeCiDeS wHaT's "HaRmFuL"?"
Why do I even need to debate such subhuman species when I IQ- and knowledge-mog them to oblivion and back 10 times?
there's a 99.99% chance I'm right; If a miracle happens and some grey turns out to be right while I'm wrong,
they're free to prove it with studies backing up their point that rank highly on the evidemce hierarchy & get their posts retrieved.
Unlike Org and other forums' pussy moderators who follow useless rules and are afraid to take necessary actions for fear of being accused of rule-breaking or moderator abuse.
We already delete low-effort junk posts here, with moderators acting unchallenged on their own authority.
This results in a tenfold higher quality of general discussion compared to the org, which is filled with junk threads that most people avoid opening because they ruin their mood.
Might as well delete retarded nonsense like:
"muh bonesmashing, muh height growth at 16 with GH, muh Accutane bad, muh natural diet, muh raw meat, muh sugar diet, muh mewing."
and Ban the retards/trolls who spread misinformation with 80 posts and 90% of them containing false information.
It's much better than spending 100 hours on threads explaining the most obvious things to retards, covering 70% of the discussion about psychological biases and evidence hierarchy, only for the vast majority to either not read or be incapable of understanding and logic due to their inferior intelligence.
Even if there's some inaccuracy and we delete 1% of good content,
deleting the majority of misinformation and misleading posts will actually improve the forum's quality dramatically.
This means the general consensus of this forum will be 99% correct and would allow us to move forward to useful information instead of continuing to argue things that have already been settled.
There is no point in arguing with people who don't even understand the hierarchy of evidence.
subhuman creatures who dismiss randomized controlled trials and proper measurements with a Google search, vague AI outputs, “muh some doctor said so,” or anecdotes from a friend. or they try to recall selective, biased info from their subhuman faulty memory, mixing up timelines and details, and ofcourse! they can't recognize cognitive biases.
"mUh FrEE sPeEcH mUSt bE dIsCuSsEd—oR eLsE wHo DeCiDeS wHaT's "HaRmFuL"?"
Why do I even need to debate such subhuman species when I IQ- and knowledge-mog them to oblivion and back 10 times?
there's a 99.99% chance I'm right; If a miracle happens and some grey turns out to be right while I'm wrong,
they're free to prove it with studies backing up their point that rank highly on the evidemce hierarchy & get their posts retrieved.
Unlike Org and other forums' pussy moderators who follow useless rules and are afraid to take necessary actions for fear of being accused of rule-breaking or moderator abuse.
We already delete low-effort junk posts here, with moderators acting unchallenged on their own authority.
This results in a tenfold higher quality of general discussion compared to the org, which is filled with junk threads that most people avoid opening because they ruin their mood.
Might as well delete retarded nonsense like:
"muh bonesmashing, muh height growth at 16 with GH, muh Accutane bad, muh natural diet, muh raw meat, muh sugar diet, muh mewing."
and Ban the retards/trolls who spread misinformation with 80 posts and 90% of them containing false information.
It's much better than spending 100 hours on threads explaining the most obvious things to retards, covering 70% of the discussion about psychological biases and evidence hierarchy, only for the vast majority to either not read or be incapable of understanding and logic due to their inferior intelligence.
Even if there's some inaccuracy and we delete 1% of good content,
deleting the majority of misinformation and misleading posts will actually improve the forum's quality dramatically.
This means the general consensus of this forum will be 99% correct and would allow us to move forward to useful information instead of continuing to argue things that have already been settled.
,we will molecule you into being someone better instead than yourself boiii 
