Looksmax - Men's Self Improvement Forum

Welcome to the ultimate men’s self-improvement community where like-minded individuals come together to level up every aspect of their lives. Whether it’s building confidence, improving your mindset, optimizing health, or mastering aesthetics, this is the place to become the best version of yourself. Join the hood and start your transformation today.

Discussion Strikingness Can Be More Important Than Averageness For Ethnics And Niche Phenos (1 Viewer)

Discussion Strikingness Can Be More Important Than Averageness For Ethnics And Niche Phenos

PolisCommov

Old Gen Ruined The Earth
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Posts
17
Reputation
49
TL;DR: For Ethnics or Whites with Niche Phenos (gingers, arguably white looking Arabs could fall in this category as well) High Strikingness is actually more important than High Averageness in terms of actually successful broad appeal, but High Averageness can help you if you are LTN-MTN only trying to nichemaxx for women who generally have a bias towards your race/pheno (but these are a minority of women).

This is a theory I've recently developed after years of reading the same studies people spam on these forums and youtube videos, and hearing the same arguments over and over where people would say how High Averageness is a hallmark of objective facial aesthetics (true) and that without it you look uncanny/low appeal (cope).

It clicked for me when I was watching a WheatWaffles stream with some East Asian guy, and the East Asian guy talked about how studies show people have much greater difficulty distinguishing between faces of other races, and that this is true for all races. This is water, we all have seen these studies before (though I think not being able to tell faces apart is also a cue for low IQ lol). But the thing is, people never bring this up in arguments about averageness vs strikingness, when they absolutely should because High Averageness directly contributes to higher Racial Face Blindness.

Now on one hand what this means is that yes, this on it's surface is a benefit to most men with a race/pheno that some women from another race/pheno find attractive because a 5-6/10 woman has a harder time recognizing the precise attractiveness level of a 4/10 guy, but she definitely knows is that he is her type. So imagine the cliche oxford study, lanky LTN-MTN white guy in STEM with no game who gets a MTB-HTB asian american woman, or some LTN mestizo latino guy who gets a white MTB because he has "exotic" appeal. But this runs into a few issues, 1) this only applies to the select few women who have a very strong specific bias towards that race/pheno, meanwhile the supermajority of women will just have either a strong race/pheno loyalty for their own race/pheno, or be JBW.

And 2) this phenomenon of the combination of Racial Face Blindness + race/pheno preference, actually would be a disadvantage to the attractive men (HTN-Chadlite, arguably even HTN-Chad) of that race/pheno who women from another race/pheno find attractive. Because those women simply naturally find it more difficul to discern those men's relative attractiveness rarity, compared to her ability to discern the same for men of her own race/pheno. So Tyronelite/Mestizo Chadriguez-lite don't get the Chadlite equivalent treatment, and their LTN-MTN black/latino peers actually get higher treatment than they "deserve".

High Strikingness therefore would be a more valuable trait for men to have for interracial attractiveness, but particularly for Ethnic/Niche Pheno men (because in the majority of cases where women are not race loyal, they are JBW or have high preference towards them). This would help both with issue 1) to stand out to women who don't normally go for your race/pheno, and issue 2) if you are HTN-Chadlite Strikingness is the only way to save you from being treated similarly to your lower attractiveness same race peers just because she has a bias towards your race/pheno.

This means that these High Strikingness traits are more valuable in Ethnic/Niche Pheno men compared to white guys: striking height (6'3"+), striking frame (large shoulder breadth/joints), striking leanness (10-14% bodyfat), striking eye color (lighter color for respective race/pheno), striking physique (looking juiced).

This should all be water, what do you see black guys for example do the most for increasing their SMV? Getting jacked as much as people and lowering their bodyfat percentage, I would argue this is literally one of the biggest reasons why black men are the only group in the USA who are less obese than the women of their own race. Just think about it for 2 seconds, if you had to ask: is physique more important for Ethnics or Whites, what would you answer? Meanwhile many of the white blackpillers spent years laughing about "muh gymcel". I would also argue that black guys understand more than other races the importance of height in slaying, while whites or asians are more likely to just say "face is king" or "only face matters", even though I agree face is most important but it's definitely not 75%+ if you are at least MTN.
 

bob08674

King of spamming "DNRD"
Joined
Nov 22, 2025
Posts
1,869
Reputation
3,555
TL;DR: For Ethnics or Whites with Niche Phenos (gingers, arguably white looking Arabs could fall in this category as well) High Strikingness is actually more important than High Averageness in terms of actually successful broad appeal, but High Averageness can help you if you are LTN-MTN only trying to nichemaxx for women who generally have a bias towards your race/pheno (but these are a minority of women).

This is a theory I've recently developed after years of reading the same studies people spam on these forums and youtube videos, and hearing the same arguments over and over where people would say how High Averageness is a hallmark of objective facial aesthetics (true) and that without it you look uncanny/low appeal (cope).

It clicked for me when I was watching a WheatWaffles stream with some East Asian guy, and the East Asian guy talked about how studies show people have much greater difficulty distinguishing between faces of other races, and that this is true for all races. This is water, we all have seen these studies before (though I think not being able to tell faces apart is also a cue for low IQ lol). But the thing is, people never bring this up in arguments about averageness vs strikingness, when they absolutely should because High Averageness directly contributes to higher Racial Face Blindness.

Now on one hand what this means is that yes, this on it's surface is a benefit to most men with a race/pheno that some women from another race/pheno find attractive because a 5-6/10 woman has a harder time recognizing the precise attractiveness level of a 4/10 guy, but she definitely knows is that he is her type. So imagine the cliche oxford study, lanky LTN-MTN white guy in STEM with no game who gets a MTB-HTB asian american woman, or some LTN mestizo latino guy who gets a white MTB because he has "exotic" appeal. But this runs into a few issues, 1) this only applies to the select few women who have a very strong specific bias towards that race/pheno, meanwhile the supermajority of women will just have either a strong race/pheno loyalty for their own race/pheno, or be JBW.

And 2) this phenomenon of the combination of Racial Face Blindness + race/pheno preference, actually would be a disadvantage to the attractive men (HTN-Chadlite, arguably even HTN-Chad) of that race/pheno who women from another race/pheno find attractive. Because those women simply naturally find it more difficul to discern those men's relative attractiveness rarity, compared to her ability to discern the same for men of her own race/pheno. So Tyronelite/Mestizo Chadriguez-lite don't get the Chadlite equivalent treatment, and their LTN-MTN black/latino peers actually get higher treatment than they "deserve".

High Strikingness therefore would be a more valuable trait for men to have for interracial attractiveness, but particularly for Ethnic/Niche Pheno men (because in the majority of cases where women are not race loyal, they are JBW or have high preference towards them). This would help both with issue 1) to stand out to women who don't normally go for your race/pheno, and issue 2) if you are HTN-Chadlite Strikingness is the only way to save you from being treated similarly to your lower attractiveness same race peers just because she has a bias towards your race/pheno.

This means that these High Strikingness traits are more valuable in Ethnic/Niche Pheno men compared to white guys: striking height (6'3"+), striking frame (large shoulder breadth/joints), striking leanness (10-14% bodyfat), striking eye color (lighter color for respective race/pheno), striking physique (looking juiced).

This should all be water, what do you see black guys for example do the most for increasing their SMV? Getting jacked as much as people and lowering their bodyfat percentage, I would argue this is literally one of the biggest reasons why black men are the only group in the USA who are less obese than the women of their own race. Just think about it for 2 seconds, if you had to ask: is physique more important for Ethnics or Whites, what would you answer? Meanwhile many of the white blackpillers spent years laughing about "muh gymcel". I would also argue that black guys understand more than other races the importance of height in slaying, while whites or asians are more likely to just say "face is king" or "only face matters", even though I agree face is most important but it's definitely not 75%+ if you are at least MTN.
yappanise
 

PolisCommov

Old Gen Ruined The Earth
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Posts
17
Reputation
49
Gingers r not a pheno u reccesed fuck
Bait, just stop discussing at this point.

1770925260614.png
 

PolisCommov

Old Gen Ruined The Earth
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Posts
17
Reputation
49
Interesting, idk if its ai or not
everything sounds obvious but mirin effort if not ai
I agree it should be water, but you often see people say the opposite. Also definitely not AI, a rare high effort post from me instead of just silently reading other people's posts
:spider:
 

sjzso

Mumbaian Anus Stretching or LDAR
Joined
Oct 9, 2025
Posts
1,247
Reputation
3,158
I agree it should be water, but you often see people say the opposite. Also definitely not AI, a rare high effort post from me instead of just silently reading other people's posts
:spider:
hurts to see how Deformed and reccesed you are lmao 😭😭😭😭 self ban pls lmao , 9/10 bait post tho
 

FS51

Self banned till summer
Joined
Dec 25, 2025
Posts
3,316
Reputation
8,069
TL;DR: For Ethnics or Whites with Niche Phenos (gingers, arguably white looking Arabs could fall in this category as well) High Strikingness is actually more important than High Averageness in terms of actually successful broad appeal, but High Averageness can help you if you are LTN-MTN only trying to nichemaxx for women who generally have a bias towards your race/pheno (but these are a minority of women).

This is a theory I've recently developed after years of reading the same studies people spam on these forums and youtube videos, and hearing the same arguments over and over where people would say how High Averageness is a hallmark of objective facial aesthetics (true) and that without it you look uncanny/low appeal (cope).

It clicked for me when I was watching a WheatWaffles stream with some East Asian guy, and the East Asian guy talked about how studies show people have much greater difficulty distinguishing between faces of other races, and that this is true for all races. This is water, we all have seen these studies before (though I think not being able to tell faces apart is also a cue for low IQ lol). But the thing is, people never bring this up in arguments about averageness vs strikingness, when they absolutely should because High Averageness directly contributes to higher Racial Face Blindness.

Now on one hand what this means is that yes, this on it's surface is a benefit to most men with a race/pheno that some women from another race/pheno find attractive because a 5-6/10 woman has a harder time recognizing the precise attractiveness level of a 4/10 guy, but she definitely knows is that he is her type. So imagine the cliche oxford study, lanky LTN-MTN white guy in STEM with no game who gets a MTB-HTB asian american woman, or some LTN mestizo latino guy who gets a white MTB because he has "exotic" appeal. But this runs into a few issues, 1) this only applies to the select few women who have a very strong specific bias towards that race/pheno, meanwhile the supermajority of women will just have either a strong race/pheno loyalty for their own race/pheno, or be JBW.

And 2) this phenomenon of the combination of Racial Face Blindness + race/pheno preference, actually would be a disadvantage to the attractive men (HTN-Chadlite, arguably even HTN-Chad) of that race/pheno who women from another race/pheno find attractive. Because those women simply naturally find it more difficul to discern those men's relative attractiveness rarity, compared to her ability to discern the same for men of her own race/pheno. So Tyronelite/Mestizo Chadriguez-lite don't get the Chadlite equivalent treatment, and their LTN-MTN black/latino peers actually get higher treatment than they "deserve".

High Strikingness therefore would be a more valuable trait for men to have for interracial attractiveness, but particularly for Ethnic/Niche Pheno men (because in the majority of cases where women are not race loyal, they are JBW or have high preference towards them). This would help both with issue 1) to stand out to women who don't normally go for your race/pheno, and issue 2) if you are HTN-Chadlite Strikingness is the only way to save you from being treated similarly to your lower attractiveness same race peers just because she has a bias towards your race/pheno.

This means that these High Strikingness traits are more valuable in Ethnic/Niche Pheno men compared to white guys: striking height (6'3"+), striking frame (large shoulder breadth/joints), striking leanness (10-14% bodyfat), striking eye color (lighter color for respective race/pheno), striking physique (looking juiced).

This should all be water, what do you see black guys for example do the most for increasing their SMV? Getting jacked as much as people and lowering their bodyfat percentage, I would argue this is literally one of the biggest reasons why black men are the only group in the USA who are less obese than the women of their own race. Just think about it for 2 seconds, if you had to ask: is physique more important for Ethnics or Whites, what would you answer? Meanwhile many of the white blackpillers spent years laughing about "muh gymcel". I would also argue that black guys understand more than other races the importance of height in slaying, while whites or asians are more likely to just say "face is king" or "only face matters", even though I agree face is most important but it's definitely not 75%+ if you are at least MTN.
Agreed
 

PolisCommov

Old Gen Ruined The Earth
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Posts
17
Reputation
49
so if im a chinky chink do i dye my hair blond and get blue contacts
ngl I'm not familiar with the ways asians normally improve strikingness. I will say blue contacts are gonna be seen as Giga ND and cringe, if you do get contacts do light brown. Dyeing blonde hair usually works if you have tan skin, so something like SEA coloring could suit blonde hair well similar to brazilians imo. Otherwise asians normally prefer looking paler, I think that would contribute to strikingness.

But yeah improving frame alone with shoulder targeted weightlifting is a universal improvement for strikingness regardless of race. I would also say dark and dense eyebrows are hugely important, so if they are very light then consider dyeing them, and if they are sparse consider minoxidil.
 

gaylarpmaster

faggot
Joined
Dec 6, 2025
Posts
1,154
Reputation
1,271
ngl I'm not familiar with the ways asians normally improve strikingness. I will say blue contacts are gonna be seen as Giga ND and cringe, if you do get contacts do light brown. Dyeing blonde hair usually works if you have tan skin, so something like SEA coloring could suit blonde hair well similar to brazilians imo. Otherwise asians normally prefer looking paler, I think that would contribute to strikingness.

But yeah improving frame alone with shoulder targeted weightlifting is a universal improvement for strikingness regardless of race. I would also say dark and dense eyebrows are hugely important, so if they are very light then consider dyeing them, and if they are sparse consider minoxidil.
should i dye my hair like light brown light brown contacts im pretty white im east asian
 

PolisCommov

Old Gen Ruined The Earth
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Posts
17
Reputation
49
should i dye my hair like light brown light brown contacts im pretty white im east asian
It will likely stick out as east asians mostly have black hair, but it might not be a bad thing as long as it's not too light brown.
This guy looks good so I would say definitely no lighter than this:
1771005424326.png


I think something like that won't be a big deal as long as you're not super pale.
 

saintshark

Iron
Joined
Nov 27, 2025
Posts
47
Reputation
21
TL;DR: For Ethnics or Whites with Niche Phenos (gingers, arguably white looking Arabs could fall in this category as well) High Strikingness is actually more important than High Averageness in terms of actually successful broad appeal, but High Averageness can help you if you are LTN-MTN only trying to nichemaxx for women who generally have a bias towards your race/pheno (but these are a minority of women).

This is a theory I've recently developed after years of reading the same studies people spam on these forums and youtube videos, and hearing the same arguments over and over where people would say how High Averageness is a hallmark of objective facial aesthetics (true) and that without it you look uncanny/low appeal (cope).

It clicked for me when I was watching a WheatWaffles stream with some East Asian guy, and the East Asian guy talked about how studies show people have much greater difficulty distinguishing between faces of other races, and that this is true for all races. This is water, we all have seen these studies before (though I think not being able to tell faces apart is also a cue for low IQ lol). But the thing is, people never bring this up in arguments about averageness vs strikingness, when they absolutely should because High Averageness directly contributes to higher Racial Face Blindness.

Now on one hand what this means is that yes, this on it's surface is a benefit to most men with a race/pheno that some women from another race/pheno find attractive because a 5-6/10 woman has a harder time recognizing the precise attractiveness level of a 4/10 guy, but she definitely knows is that he is her type. So imagine the cliche oxford study, lanky LTN-MTN white guy in STEM with no game who gets a MTB-HTB asian american woman, or some LTN mestizo latino guy who gets a white MTB because he has "exotic" appeal. But this runs into a few issues, 1) this only applies to the select few women who have a very strong specific bias towards that race/pheno, meanwhile the supermajority of women will just have either a strong race/pheno loyalty for their own race/pheno, or be JBW.

And 2) this phenomenon of the combination of Racial Face Blindness + race/pheno preference, actually would be a disadvantage to the attractive men (HTN-Chadlite, arguably even HTN-Chad) of that race/pheno who women from another race/pheno find attractive. Because those women simply naturally find it more difficul to discern those men's relative attractiveness rarity, compared to her ability to discern the same for men of her own race/pheno. So Tyronelite/Mestizo Chadriguez-lite don't get the Chadlite equivalent treatment, and their LTN-MTN black/latino peers actually get higher treatment than they "deserve".

High Strikingness therefore would be a more valuable trait for men to have for interracial attractiveness, but particularly for Ethnic/Niche Pheno men (because in the majority of cases where women are not race loyal, they are JBW or have high preference towards them). This would help both with issue 1) to stand out to women who don't normally go for your race/pheno, and issue 2) if you are HTN-Chadlite Strikingness is the only way to save you from being treated similarly to your lower attractiveness same race peers just because she has a bias towards your race/pheno.

This means that these High Strikingness traits are more valuable in Ethnic/Niche Pheno men compared to white guys: striking height (6'3"+), striking frame (large shoulder breadth/joints), striking leanness (10-14% bodyfat), striking eye color (lighter color for respective race/pheno), striking physique (looking juiced).

This should all be water, what do you see black guys for example do the most for increasing their SMV? Getting jacked as much as people and lowering their bodyfat percentage, I would argue this is literally one of the biggest reasons why black men are the only group in the USA who are less obese than the women of their own race. Just think about it for 2 seconds, if you had to ask: is physique more important for Ethnics or Whites, what would you answer? Meanwhile many of the white blackpillers spent years laughing about "muh gymcel". I would also argue that black guys understand more than other races the importance of height in slaying, while whites or asians are more likely to just say "face is king" or "only face matters", even though I agree face is most important but it's definitely not 75%+ if you are at least MTN.
 

Attachments

  • 4675884-b63bb89ea56774018bf6531cf07caf31.mp4
    7.3 MB

Kid_Hanuman

Godzillalover
Joined
Jan 19, 2026
Posts
72
Reputation
87
TL;DR: For Ethnics or Whites with Niche Phenos (gingers, arguably white looking Arabs could fall in this category as well) High Strikingness is actually more important than High Averageness in terms of actually successful broad appeal, but High Averageness can help you if you are LTN-MTN only trying to nichemaxx for women who generally have a bias towards your race/pheno (but these are a minority of women).

This is a theory I've recently developed after years of reading the same studies people spam on these forums and youtube videos, and hearing the same arguments over and over where people would say how High Averageness is a hallmark of objective facial aesthetics (true) and that without it you look uncanny/low appeal (cope).

It clicked for me when I was watching a WheatWaffles stream with some East Asian guy, and the East Asian guy talked about how studies show people have much greater difficulty distinguishing between faces of other races, and that this is true for all races. This is water, we all have seen these studies before (though I think not being able to tell faces apart is also a cue for low IQ lol). But the thing is, people never bring this up in arguments about averageness vs strikingness, when they absolutely should because High Averageness directly contributes to higher Racial Face Blindness.

Now on one hand what this means is that yes, this on it's surface is a benefit to most men with a race/pheno that some women from another race/pheno find attractive because a 5-6/10 woman has a harder time recognizing the precise attractiveness level of a 4/10 guy, but she definitely knows is that he is her type. So imagine the cliche oxford study, lanky LTN-MTN white guy in STEM with no game who gets a MTB-HTB asian american woman, or some LTN mestizo latino guy who gets a white MTB because he has "exotic" appeal. But this runs into a few issues, 1) this only applies to the select few women who have a very strong specific bias towards that race/pheno, meanwhile the supermajority of women will just have either a strong race/pheno loyalty for their own race/pheno, or be JBW.

And 2) this phenomenon of the combination of Racial Face Blindness + race/pheno preference, actually would be a disadvantage to the attractive men (HTN-Chadlite, arguably even HTN-Chad) of that race/pheno who women from another race/pheno find attractive. Because those women simply naturally find it more difficul to discern those men's relative attractiveness rarity, compared to her ability to discern the same for men of her own race/pheno. So Tyronelite/Mestizo Chadriguez-lite don't get the Chadlite equivalent treatment, and their LTN-MTN black/latino peers actually get higher treatment than they "deserve".

High Strikingness therefore would be a more valuable trait for men to have for interracial attractiveness, but particularly for Ethnic/Niche Pheno men (because in the majority of cases where women are not race loyal, they are JBW or have high preference towards them). This would help both with issue 1) to stand out to women who don't normally go for your race/pheno, and issue 2) if you are HTN-Chadlite Strikingness is the only way to save you from being treated similarly to your lower attractiveness same race peers just because she has a bias towards your race/pheno.

This means that these High Strikingness traits are more valuable in Ethnic/Niche Pheno men compared to white guys: striking height (6'3"+), striking frame (large shoulder breadth/joints), striking leanness (10-14% bodyfat), striking eye color (lighter color for respective race/pheno), striking physique (looking juiced).

This should all be water, what do you see black guys for example do the most for increasing their SMV? Getting jacked as much as people and lowering their bodyfat percentage, I would argue this is literally one of the biggest reasons why black men are the only group in the USA who are less obese than the women of their own race. Just think about it for 2 seconds, if you had to ask: is physique more important for Ethnics or Whites, what would you answer? Meanwhile many of the white blackpillers spent years laughing about "muh gymcel". I would also argue that black guys understand more than other races the importance of height in slaying, while whites or asians are more likely to just say "face is king" or "only face matters", even though I agree face is most important but it's definitely not 75%+ if you are at least MTN.
Amazing post instasaved
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top