[Manifestme]

Ive decided to stop larping on forums and what better way than to start a high iq debate.
I will give out the reasons i belive bonesmashing isnt cope and you give out yours
1. Force upon bone will activate osteoblast cells, the cells will then divide and so on. If the process is repeated the osteoblast activity will greatly surpass the osteo reabsorbtion activity giving the bone more mass and density

2. Subperiostal hematoma ossification, this one is a bit tricky because its super uncontrollable and is still a theory that doesnt have much science behind it. So i cant effectivley use it in this argument but to dumb it down its basically saying that the hematoma created because of force on the outer layer of the bone will ossify. But here comes the problem, most of the time the blood will just be reabsorbed instead of ossifying, so to make it ossify the stress needs to be great and the inflamation even greater. Also your body needs to signal bmps into that area wich is imposiblle to predict.
(Sorry for bad english)

Tell me if this thread was shitty or not

 

[Michael b]

W thread

 

[hERo88]

Ive decided to stop larping on forums and what better way than to start a high iq debate.
I will give out the reasons i belive bonesmashing isnt cope and you give out yours
1. Force upon bone will activate osteoblast cells, the cells will then divide and so on. If the process is repeated the osteoblast activity will greatly surpass the osteo reabsorbtion activity giving the bone more mass and density

2. Subperiostal hematoma ossification, this one is a bit tricky because its super uncontrollable and is still a theory that doesnt have much science behind it. So i cant effectivley use it in this argument but to dumb it down its basically saying that the hematoma created because of force on the outer layer of the bone will ossify. But here comes the problem, most of the time the blood will just be reabsorbed instead of ossifying, so to make it ossify the stress needs to be great and the inflamation even greater. Also your body needs to signal bmps into that area wich is imposiblle to predict.
(Sorry for bad english)

Tell me if this thread was shitty or not

It works but you have to do it for a long time and youll prob get nerve damage

 

[Manifestme]

It works but you have to do it for a long time and youll prob get nerve damage

Why would i need nerves pft

 

[Judenbänker]

1. Force upon bone will activate osteoblast cells, the cells will then divide and so on. If the process is repeated the osteoblast activity will greatly surpass the osteo reabsorbtion activity giving the bone more mass and density

Wrong

systematic mechanical load will increase density

abrupt trauma and microtears will stimulate RAP which will only aim to repair tissue to its original size and usually ends with slightly more absorption than what was there before

2. Subperiostal hematoma ossification, this one is a bit tricky because its super uncontrollable and is still a theory that doesnt have much science behind it. So i cant effectivley use it in this argument but to dumb it down its basically saying that the hematoma created because of force on the outer layer of the bone will ossify. But here comes the problem, most of the time the blood will just be reabsorbed instead of ossifying, so to make it ossify the stress needs to be great and the inflamation even greater. Also your body needs to signal bmps into that area wich is imposiblle to predict.

Callus formation in the hematoma will in the end result in absorption as well

new callus will form around the injury and act as a temporary "scaffold" for repairing construction but afterwards will be reabsorbed again and the bone will be reduced to its original state