Theory GHK-CU is the biggest scam in BP/LM 😂 (Part 1) (1 Viewer)

[Nardicus102]

This will be a lazy post but,
I will be making a more detailed thread on this in up coming week which will be more high effort but this will hold as a summary to my points


Reasons:

1. The bac water mixed with copper makes the copper ions unstable (So instability paired with a short half life, your lucky if it even reaches the eperdermis of the skin, n even than, with a short half life, it cant make any meaningful difference on the skin)

2. The Half life of GHK-CU is very short so claims like ("2mg injections for 2 months cause glow and purge and collage") make no pharmacological sense

3. Gene modulation benifits are massively overstated, n no one even understands what there talking about when mentioning this as a benifit.

4. If it truly worked, research would not have stalled, it couldn't even go through phase 1 of systemic use in humans causes even the PHD researcher's knew it was a waste of time, Research does not stall for no reason.

5. Hair thickening claims are placebo at best, it doesnt even interact with the follicle.

6. If your someone who has ever spent money on this and watched someone on TikTok promoting this, they are greedy scammer's with a link in there bio, congrats!!! you have been CUCKED by them JFL.

7. There are legit better options that exist for every claim about it that has been made regarding this peptide.

8. Topical is better, n even than, the topical isnt even that good to begin with n for people saying its "cope" are close to retarded

That is all, let me know if there is any other point you would like for me to touch up on, when making a more detailed thread on this

 

[birthdefect]

This will be a lazy post but,
I will be making a more detailed thread on this in up coming week which will be more high effort but this will hold as a summary to my points


Reasons:

1. The bac water mixed with copper makes the copper ions unstable (So instability paired with a short half life, your lucky if it even reaches the eperdermis of the skin, n even than, with a short half life, it cant make any meaningful difference on the skin)

2. The Half life of GHK-CU is very short so claims like ("2mg injections for 2 months cause glow and purge and collage") make no pharmacological sense

3. Gene modulation benifits are massively overstated, n no one even understands what there talking about when mentioning this as a benifit.

4. If it truly worked, research would not have stalled, it couldn't even go through phase 1 of systemic use in humans causes even the PHD researcher's knew it was a waste of time, Research does not stall for no reason.

5. Hair thickening claims are placebo at best, it doesnt even interact with the follicle.

6. If your someone who has ever spent money on this and watched someone on TikTok promoting this, they are greedy scammer's with a link in there bio, congrats!!! you have been CUCKED by them JFL.

7. There are legit better options that exist for every claim about it that has been made regarding this peptide.

8. Topical is better, n even than, the topical isnt even that good to begin with n for people saying its "cope" are close to retarded

That is all, let me know if there is any other point you would like for me to touch up on, when making a more detailed thread on this

ghkcu has to be mixed with pbs to do anything but yea it does basically nothing

 

[Nardicus102]

ghkcu has to be mixed with pbs to do anything but yea it does basically nothing

Even with PBS its a waste of time, I will also explain in a future thread, but lets logically think about it

PBS has a short half life, expensive, and not easy to source. and lets say those weren't true at all, the GHK-CU is not going to do fuck all for the skin still, still has a short half life (like minutes) and it doesnt even bind to any critical receptors responsible for making a big difference within the skin.

"But the collage benifits" there incredibly comical, In research they already use PBS, and they realized it wasn't even that effective.
Things like meth and fentanyl go through research cause there effective despite being labeled as bad drugs.
its been in research since the 70's, if it even remotely had decent systemic effect, big pharma would of capitalized on it let alone take it through a phase 1 trail in humans (This isnt even a high bar btw)

 

[Mirinzygos]

This will be a lazy post but,
I will be making a more detailed thread on this in up coming week which will be more high effort but this will hold as a summary to my points


Reasons:

1. The bac water mixed with copper makes the copper ions unstable (So instability paired with a short half life, your lucky if it even reaches the eperdermis of the skin, n even than, with a short half life, it cant make any meaningful difference on the skin)

2. The Half life of GHK-CU is very short so claims like ("2mg injections for 2 months cause glow and purge and collage") make no pharmacological sense

3. Gene modulation benifits are massively overstated, n no one even understands what there talking about when mentioning this as a benifit.

4. If it truly worked, research would not have stalled, it couldn't even go through phase 1 of systemic use in humans causes even the PHD researcher's knew it was a waste of time, Research does not stall for no reason.

5. Hair thickening claims are placebo at best, it doesnt even interact with the follicle.

6. If your someone who has ever spent money on this and watched someone on TikTok promoting this, they are greedy scammer's with a link in there bio, congrats!!! you have been CUCKED by them JFL.

7. There are legit better options that exist for every claim about it that has been made regarding this peptide.

8. Topical is better, n even than, the topical isnt even that good to begin with n for people saying its "cope" are close to retarded

That is all, let me know if there is any other point you would like for me to touch up on, when making a more detailed thread on this

You don’t use bacteriostatic water you are meant to use phosphate buffered saline but I agree that it won’t do as much as what people expect it to do. It’s mild at its highest point

 

[Nardicus102]

You don’t use bacteriostatic water you are meant to use phosphate buffered saline but I agree that it won’t do as much as what people expect it to do. It’s mild at its highest point

Mild ???? That’s a compliment genuinely. It’s more closer to placebo. PBS is used with everything labs majority of the time.

I would even argue something like CJC is far better for the skin than GHK by a long shot
N Cjc is a meme
But because it was able to do something, it ended up being researched unlike GHK