Serious Dear moderation of looksmax.gg (2 Viewers)

[rev]

Absolutely Nots, I believe my post shouldn't be marked "low effort junk" because although it may have been simple and to the point, it still added value to both the discussion in general and the topic of the particular forum area it was posted in. Not all useful posts have to be long and/or have a lot of detail, to be considered useful; they can also include, for example, a basic observation, question... etc., that leads to conversation and helps others to engage with the subject at hand. To label my post "low effort" without taking into account the context or potential for discussion it may have generated seems unfair. I would like to get a more thorough explanation of exactly what about my post made it qualify as "low effort," since from my point of view, it was a legitimate post that contributed to the overall community.

 

[nettspend]

They do not care bro how do I tell you

 

[Godveil Heir]

dnr

 

[rev]

They do not care bro how do I tell you

For shits and giggles i don’t care

 

[rev]

dnr

High effort or what cunt

 

[irlesper]

second times the charm is what they say i think

 

[Michael b]

I agree

 

[Mandy]

Feminine females or masculine females? Dawg,this isn’t helpful especially if you’re into dudes for example. Also I clicked on that thread for 1 second and I think I saw that MTB Gio Scotti,so deserved ig.

 

[gqq]

View attachment 34496
Absolutely Nots, I believe my post shouldn't be marked "low effort junk" because although it may have been simple and to the point, it still added value to both the discussion in general and the topic of the particular forum area it was posted in. Not all useful posts have to be long and/or have a lot of detail, to be considered useful; they can also include, for example, a basic observation, question... etc., that leads to conversation and helps others to engage with the subject at hand. To label my post "low effort" without taking into account the context or potential for discussion it may have generated seems unfair. I would like to get a more thorough explanation of exactly what about my post made it qualify as "low effort," since from my point of view, it was a legitimate post that contributed to the overall community.

masculine females so they can tidy me up in the cute little space between they're tricep and arm pit

 

[NoBONES]

arm pit

 

[Mandy]

View attachment 34504

Real son

 

[Momo2007]

I honestly agree. I feel like some of the moderators are fucking retarded.

 

[Godveil Heir]

I honestly agree. I feel like some of the moderators are fucking retarded.

Ofc it's a guy who can't post in the correct section and already has 70 warning points despite having less than 50 posts.

 

[Oryza]

View attachment 34496
Absolutely Nots, I believe my post shouldn't be marked "low effort junk" because although it may have been simple and to the point, it still added value to both the discussion in general and the topic of the particular forum area it was posted in. Not all useful posts have to be long and/or have a lot of detail, to be considered useful; they can also include, for example, a basic observation, question... etc., that leads to conversation and helps others to engage with the subject at hand. To label my post "low effort" without taking into account the context or potential for discussion it may have generated seems unfair. I would like to get a more thorough explanation of exactly what about my post made it qualify as "low effort," since from my point of view, it was a legitimate post that contributed to the overall community.

they’re ruining the .gg culture. Honestly if everything stayed the same and was archived in a few years we could have some memories atleast of what it was like but they’re just deleting it

 

[Circadex]

Ofc it's a guy who can't post in the correct section and already has 70 warning points despite having less than 50 posts.

Wasting molecules

 

[Godveil Heir]

they’re ruining the .gg culture. Honestly if everything stayed the same and was archived in a few years we could have some memories atleast of what it was like but they’re just deleting it

 

[Circadex]

they’re ruining the .gg culture. Honestly if everything stayed the same and was archived in a few years we could have some memories atleast of what it was like but they’re just deleting it

LMAO

 

[Momo2007]

Ofc it's a guy who can't post in the correct section and already has 70 warning points despite having less than 50 posts.

cause I had no idea and they didn’t make it clear that I was getting negative points. I didn’t even know how the negative system even worked until I caught banned. That’s obviously my fault but it should be more clear.

 

[rev]

Ofc it's a guy who can't post in the correct section and already has 70 warning points despite having less than 50 posts.

These bitches are taking this shit seriously even after I said it was for shit and giggles