Firstsubhuman
Pflpilled
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2025
- Posts
- 1,578
- Reputation
- 2,128
For proving this statement, I'll establish a framework;
Pick action -> put action into a scenario where its bad -> put action into a scenario where its good.
(We'll weigh "good" and "bad" based on utilitarianism)
Action number one: Killing someone.
Scenario where its bad: Killing a random person on the beach who did nothing wrong
Scenario where it's good: Killing a mass murderer otw to killing another family.
This proves my statement that actions themselves aren't moral or immoral based off the fact that you could use the "Immoral" action in a good way.
What about a good action? Can we put it into a bad scenario? Yes.
Action number two: donating to charity.
I don't have to put this one into a good scenario first
Bad scenario: You are donating to a charity to raise bail for a serial killer.
These are just a few examples, and obviously they are extreme, but I think you can get my point from this.
Pick action -> put action into a scenario where its bad -> put action into a scenario where its good.
(We'll weigh "good" and "bad" based on utilitarianism)
Action number one: Killing someone.
Scenario where its bad: Killing a random person on the beach who did nothing wrong
Scenario where it's good: Killing a mass murderer otw to killing another family.
This proves my statement that actions themselves aren't moral or immoral based off the fact that you could use the "Immoral" action in a good way.
What about a good action? Can we put it into a bad scenario? Yes.
Action number two: donating to charity.
I don't have to put this one into a good scenario first
Bad scenario: You are donating to a charity to raise bail for a serial killer.
These are just a few examples, and obviously they are extreme, but I think you can get my point from this.


